jonathan1967
FastBikerBoy
I now use a MCU & XT. I use to use a BCF in Mackie mode - I still have it as an ACT controller. IMHO there is no better value controller than the BCF. It's superb for the money.
Karl,
I'm looking at a picture of the BCF on the Sweetwater site, and I can't see any dedicated transport controls.
I'm wondering how you access these buttons on the device, and whether it poses any inconvenience.
Also, assuming I don't care about motorized/touch sensitive faders, I'm curious about what advantages the MCU has over the BCF.
Thanks,
Jonathan
In Mackie mode the controls are all pre-programmed. There's more shifting to do than with an MCU but it is still very usable and at the price great value. Notice I said "best value" in my statement. An MCU is "better" but at the price it should be. I don't know what the price difference is now but when I bought my BCF it was over £1000 cheaper than the full blown Mackie.
There's a guide I wrote for the BCF which will give you an idea of what it is capable of
HERE So Mackie advantages are.......
Jog wheel
Easier access to some functions as there is less shifting.
LED scribble strip (although there is a virtual one for the BCF)
Touch sensitive faders i.e. you can overwrite automation with the Mackie, the BCF faders will fight you (and win)
Access to a few more functions as it has four "M" keys compared to one on the BCF.
Bigger footprint (which could be a disadvantage)
Dedicated master fader (you have to switch the BCF)
That's about it though. Definitely not a £1000 worth IMHO which I guess leads to the question "Why have I got one?"
I got mine and the XT second hand at a very good price and I'm glad I did but I wouldn't pay full price for one over the BCF. (Cos I'm a tight git)
Bonus is I can use the BCF as an ACT controller which is something the Mackie can't do.
HTH