• SONAR
  • Studio Instruments (p.2)
2012/04/02 12:14:10
Jind
I think it's safe to say that when compared to current multi-layer,single instrument libraries it definitely falls short of the mark, or even more expensive multi-istrument libraries currently used that cost significantly more than the either purchased for $49 or thrown in as a gimmie with Sonar as Studio Instrument currently is.  

But for a product, that has not seen much development cycles since it was first introduced as a $49.00 muli-instrument library back with what, Sonar 6 (I could be wrong, I just know that I purchased it in 2007 when I was using Home Studio) it still works pretty well for fleshing out ideas quickly or for those without the resources to buy more dedicated or expansive libraries (which tend to come with a more hefty cost) to add parts to projects one is working on easily with usable results - it's really not that bad of a product.  Back when I first got it, I used it quite a bit.  Sure, now it's been replaced with Kontakt libraries for almost everything (strings, bass, drums, ...), Toontrack products for drums, Garritan GPO and Miroslav for orchestral, TruePianos for, well ... pianos, and a large variety of other products.  I've come a long way needless to say.

But all in all, Studio Instruments is a pretty good deal for those dipping their toes or looking to quickly flesh out ideas or in support of other products, I just think Cakewalk never saw it as the go to product and at $49 I probably would not expect it to replace more expensive alternatives.

Just my thoughts on it - as always individual mileage may vary.
2012/04/02 12:22:05
Jonbouy
ba_midi


Jonbouy


Never used 'em.

The only reason for me to say that is in order to re-bump the thread of course.


I haven't either.  I generally stay away from those types of instruments/plugins.  I call them "French Fries."  They come as side orders, sometimes we eat them, but they're mostly oil and fat lol.


That doesn't mean that some find good use with them, I'm sure some do.  But they tend not to be top-of-line stuff and with all the amazing options and products available today (some free) there are just better alternatives imho.


I'm not even sure it came with 8.5, I obviously didn't install it if it did...
2012/04/02 12:59:53
chuckebaby
im with billy A. there just apitizers for the main menu.but in the begining i did use them alot.(when they first came out)theyre good for some things,but not on a regular basis,but i did find velocitys though,not very broad but i did find them.
2012/04/02 14:26:57
Rimshot
I just used the bass with some added distortion and the Wurly on a blues song.  It actually beat Dim Pro for this project.  Nice and handy but not a real show stopper.

Rimshot
2012/04/02 15:25:47
bapu
Rimshot


I just used the bass with some added distortion and the Wurly on a blues song.  

Rimshot

Whaaaaaaa???!!!????

Guess I've been fired?
2012/04/02 15:35:21
Kalle Rantaaho
I've always set the velocity curves in my MIDI-keyboard. I didn't even know you can do in the soft synth :o/
2012/04/02 17:31:10
timidi
I have a Roland A-30 controller. 
I've had it for like 15 years or so. Never diddled with any of the settings, just used it to play hardware synths, that always worked and reflected touch properly, when played with this keyboard. 
Is there something different with soft synths with the handling of velocity (touch) as apposed to hardware synths? I find the SI has a range of like 100-127 (a guess). There is no subtlety.

I do like the rhodes sound. Seems very usable except for the velocity thing.

2012/04/02 18:47:22
Rimshot
Bapu
Na
Just the draft before you get it!
Rim
2012/04/02 19:34:01
bapu
Rimshot


Bapu
Na
Just the draft before you get it!
Rim

Phew!!!
2012/04/02 20:36:04
Rimshot
Bapu is smokin' on the bass!  How could it be any other way? 


Rim
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account