I see you've gotten the typical "There are no such things as good presets" answer a few times already, and I will assume the wisdom of this answer has made a decent impact. It really is true. I will also assume this answer pisses you off as much as it does me. ;) So here's my take on a practical answer.
I typically use delay to create space for vocals in several different ways. But I will give you an example for use on a focal (read: lead) vocal track. And even though you will see the setting I used - I want to spend a moment explaining WHY I used these settings so you will be able to create your own spaces based on what you want for the track.
OK. So this is a screen grab from an actual track I did recently.
First of all I never use the Sonitus delay from a preset. Never. It is just too easy to use it intentionally for a specific purpose and get a tremendous result. In this case I was going for exactly the thing you describe. A subtle delay effect designed to impart space. Usually I will use timings based on the tempo of the track I am working on. In this case I used 1/2 and 1/3 quarters on the left and right respectively. This puts me in a fairly slow version of this sort of delay. Using metallus' chart above, I would usually be shooting for something in the 40-120ms range, but this track sounded good with the 1/3-1/2 setup. More often I will land in a 1/3-1/4 setup or 1/4-1/8. Generally I will flip through some of these sorts of settings to see what sounds nice in the track. It is important to note that you MUST use asymmetrical r/l timings to create space, although locking a (mono) single timing can also sound "right" if you want that.
I will usually bring feedback and crossfeed (which is just another feedback but one that blurs the image) down fairly low. Often I will put them up a little higher than what you see here, but I am mitigating the longer delays in this case with less regen.
The filter setting is also important. We just don't need to be creating any excess buildup in the <500hz range usually, and frankly it is also slightly anomalous here that I have a lower than usual highpass @`200Hz. It sounded good with this guys vocal. And I usually want to cut off most of the frequencies above 5-6k especially avoiding the sibilance range for the singer. But again this is TOTALLY taste dependent for the singer/track/production.
While I am tweaking these values I will have the mix percent much higher than the 6% I landed on here.... then I will adjust down to taste. 6% is in the lower half of my usual range for this purpose. Again this most likely is chosen in part to mitigate the longer delay time. Sometimes I am up around 9%, but rarely will I end up in double digits. At least not for this purpose.
Now... this was a lead vocal. Had it been a BGV, I might chosen similar settings overall, but diverged with the filter and timing, and I usually would create an asymmetrical panning for the right and left channel unlinking the r/l amounts and doing something like 7%/13% or vise versa. I can be more generous for BGVs with just about all the settings. I will make timings longer, filters less draconian, and regen more generous. And especially I will push the mix slider to the right more than I will on a lead most of the time... Also in the spirit of the stereo image I'll put (much) longer/louder delays in the opposite channel from where I've panned the BGV (especially since the effect is usually pre panning)... but then I am a sucker for lush soundscapes.
Hope this helps.