Featherlight
There seems to be three types of session performers for me.
1: come in and nail it in the first couple of takes and there's lots to work with
2: hunt around for the part and then slowly craft it into a working line, later takes are the most refined
3: kind of like Nuke LaLuche in Bull Durham, all over the map and I end up comping the crap out of it and 'building' the part lol!
These 3 types describe it really well!
I see mostly type #1 and #2 (thank god) ...
I reckon, #1 is also related to who wrote the material i.e. if you are a skilled musician and you wrote the part, you're deeply into it from take #1 and the spontanous first few takes are the magic ones ... sometimes you end up tracking more to make the artist happy, and then comp out of the first 3 takes in your lonesome editing session ...
If you write for other people and they come in to record your material, you have a type #2 situation: it might take quite a while to put them into the right picture, mood, feel, intensity, ... so you end up recording a 'zillion' takes, each one being better ... if that happens you need your motivation skills to squeeze everything out of the performer and stop as soon as you reach the plateau ... then I use the last 3 takes (the last being one being the convincing performance that made you stop recording, the others being backup for things you discover when cleaing the tracks)
If you have type #3 in the rec room, you might as well stop and hit the bar early - I don't believe that a fully comped performance will go thru as a real performance; even if you technically might not hear it, the audience will feel that something is not quite natural
So bottomline for me: there's no point comping out of more than 3 takes really (the exception may be a multi-mic'd drum session with very sensitive timing)