John,
Normally, I wouldn't reply to this thread or drag up arguments from another thread, but, I too read the (lengthy) thread that you linked above and feel compelled to express my observations. It seems that the main thrust of both arguments were correct...you arguing the merits of the sonic characteristics of a stereo sound source vs. he arguing the merits of panning two or more mono sources within a stereo field to produce a single composite stereo image. Both arguments are valid and seemingly unrelated, i.e, apples to oranges.
the threads have been entertaining, though...thanks for the input.