• SONAR
  • The science of sample rates (p.18)
2014/01/22 22:17:10
stevec
Wow... between the NTTP link and Bit's quotes, this is some cross-generational flashback thread!  
 
Oh, and there's some interesting discussions too. 
 
2014/01/22 22:24:12
John
Where, where?     
2014/01/22 22:29:00
stevec
C'mon, John, you don't find quantum based sampling rates interesting?   
 
2014/01/22 22:43:34
John
Now that was funny!!!
2014/01/22 22:56:07
stevec

 
Of course, the results of inter-sample distortion at the quantum level are completely unknown, but suffice to say that the fermions are likely to argue with the bosons on this very forum at all hours of the night.   Just sayin.  
 
2014/01/22 23:00:07
John T
QUANTUM DISTORTION. It's a whole new thing to pointlessly fret and argue about.
 
Look man, I know it nulls, but I've got quantum ears, and I'm telling you, Bitwig has warmer quanta than Sonar. Sonar has really frosty quanta.
2014/01/23 00:16:52
mudgel
All I can say about this whole thread is;

"Here I am, brain as big as a planet....."
2014/01/23 04:20:26
jb101
I want Quantum Ears, like John T..
 
Or pointy ears, like Spock.
2014/01/23 06:12:00
Beepster
mudgel
All I can say about this whole thread is;

"Here I am, brain as big as a planet....."



???
2014/01/23 06:18:08
Beepster
Ah... getting poisoned by sci fi cross referencing itself...
 
Old School...
 
New school (which was butchered IMO)...
 
 
/nerd
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account