Well one of those things you mentioned was produced by the same company I fumbled my way through that album I was talking about without any instruction. Not gonna get into a thing about it because it is very much a subjective topic based in how people view routing and recording in general but from my subjective POV it was indeed an uphill battle for a while there.
Heck... you yourself helped me squirm and claw my way to getting those basics figured out. I see those old threads and shake my head now but it really was difficult for me.
However... I had NO previous experience with MIDI and I looked at things from the perspective of someone hooking things up to and through a physical board. That I think is where I faltered with Sonar initially but managed to figure out the older, more stale (IMO) concepts of DAW based recording.
I still look at the more "traditional" styled DAWs and think conceptually they are easier for my brain to figure out BUT they would be more tedious and boring to work with in practice. It's more like plugging cables in and out all day instead of magically making something cool appear/happen with a few quick keystrokes or accessing a context menu.
Knowaddimean? It's better but different and requires an alternative view of how things are done. I also think the program in its X series incarnation is still evolving. From what I've seen 8.5 used the older approach where as this Skylight stuff is like out of the future or something.
All that said I would NOT want to deal with the boring arsed GUIs and methodology of some of the competitors and the others that take a more "unique" approach simply do not suit what I need to do as mainly audio based guy.
From a design standpoint for me it was good choice and worth the effort in learning especially now that X3 seems to have ironed out most of the X series quirks.
Anyway... I should probably be working. lol