I used to use buss, like John, to differentiate it from the mass form of transportation. However, I've given up kicking against the pricks, and just use one "s" these days.
As to usage (of the thing, not the term) of buses, it helps to go back to the early days of recording to get a sense of how buses developed. Originally, there was a single bus on mixing boards, and when I say single I mean mono. You combined several inputs to a mono output. Then stereo, using a switch for channels and then pan pots. If you listen to early/mid sixties mixes they really didn't know what to do w/ the stereo space. Listen to an origianl mix of Cream's "Sunshine of your love" and you'll find Ginger's drums to one side. Or Beatles stuff when it got mixed for stereo. Vocals on one side, drums on the other, etc, etc.
Then things got better and more complex. Submixing got built into mixing desks, both sends and buses. Sends are a way to tap off the input signal and send it somewhere else than where the track itself is sent. Common uses are for monitoring (headphones or stage monitoring) and reverb, since in the analog outboard days you weren't likely to have many tape/spring units available. Lack of hardware is also part of the reason buses developed. Early on compressors and limiters (which were developed for mastering to vinyl) got put on drums etc. to keep their volume under control. However, if you only have a couple of these units, it was better use to send all the drums to the unit, rather than strap it across the kick channel only. And once you had a bus, more helped even if you didn't have a bunch of fairchild's laying around. Because all the drums, all the guitars, all the backing vocals could go on a bus w/ a fader and you could control the relative volume of the same using that one fader rather than mucking around w/ a larger number of faders and trying to keep their relative volume the same.
This lead to the common mixing board convention of tracks, sends for common effects (like reverb), and buses for grouping control (of volume, eq and compression, etc). And all these electrical connections, wiring and harnesses, and electronics made for old mixing desks larger than subcompact cars and more expensive than houses. For digtial, however, it is a bit of 1s and 0s. Cakewalk a few years ago made much of the fact that in SONAR buses and sends were the same, but still kept the naming convention. The convention sticks because 1. it works, and 2. most engineers are comfortable w/ it. Why re-invent the wheel?
IF you've ever used some of the german (or in my case dutch) digital mixers like in TC or RME, it is a mare's nest to understand. It is like the man in white in
Catch 22, where the nurses religiously switch out his pee jar w/ his IV jar. Stick to the conventions and don't worry about the spelling of bus.
@