markyzno
...meh, very disgruntled...

Sorry to hear it Markyzno.
 
As usual, I'm pretty gruntled myself. :-)

At least people are listening...  The interaction has been great...

Noel,
 
If I understand correctly, it is possible to get AAF working correctly with a codec we buy from somewhere. This is new right? I think that we couldn't do that before X3d... ?

In retrospect AAF it seems like it is intended as an interchange format between different video editing systems - it uses structured storage internally. As such its not likely to be a good format for streaming and its unlikely you will find a source codec for it. I don't know a whole lot about it but I assume a host would need to unpack an AAF file and write to a new format more suitable for streaming. Microsoft would be unlikely to support it out of the box in Media Foundation.
 

markyzno
I am going to have to roll back to that since now X3d wont load up half my video projects anymore

I don't believe that is necessary.  See
http://www.cakewalk.com/S...reader.aspx/2007013354

cparmerlee

markyzno
I am going to have to roll back to that since now X3d wont load up half my video projects anymore

I don't believe that is necessary.  See
http://www.cakewalk.com/S...reader.aspx/2007013354

Craig please see the third line of the very first post :) Cheers...

CakeAlexS

cparmerlee

markyzno
I am going to have to roll back to that since now X3d wont load up half my video projects anymore

I don't believe that is necessary.  See
http://www.cakewalk.com/S...reader.aspx/2007013354

Craig please see the third line of the very first post :) Cheers...

Yes, I saw that, but it appeared to me all the complaints were about the Media Foundation, so I don't understand why it should be necessary to roll back to X3C.  The Cakewalk article implies that if you select DirectShow, you will have the same capability as in X3C.  Is the Cakewalk article incorrect?

#38

CakeAlexS
#38

Thanks.  I missed that one.  But just to be clear, Noel is saying the same thing I am -- that there should be no reason to roll back to X3C.  Correct?

Seems to be, but I got confused later in the thread on if there is an issue or not... I'm staying out now of this one as I'm not contributing much, just a keen observer.... Cheers :-)