sharke
it always reminds me of how little EQ you can get away with if you choose your sounds wisely. 

And therein lies the rub (so to speak)

Much as I love MMultiAnalyzer, I don't find the collision display useful.
 
First of all, 95% of time the truly harmful frequency collisions are apparent without visual aids. It's akin to identifying pitch "problems" in Melodyne that weren't even audible until you could see them, and then assuming that fixing every last one of them will make your vocals sound better.
 
Second, not all collisions are necessarily problematic. Sometimes, you do it on purpose. Imagine a chef complaining "I can't taste the salt!".

bitflipper
 
Imagine a chef complaining "I can't taste the salt!".

Great analogy! 

Fleer
That's writing.
I talk like Vader.
I walk like a Wookie.
https://www.urbandictiona...=true&defid=416908

One of those is my favorite Bangles song.

I gave Neutron a try and it can make great adjustments to the EQ. The problem I find is that when I run it, the results are always different. I'm not using it on tracks, I've got it on the master buss. I ran sections of the song through the assistant several times and the results were not predictable. Sometimes the results would be amazing and sometimes horrible. 
 
Another silver bullet with auto-tarnish.

My suggestion would be to go with the "amazing" results.  YMMV.
 
:-)
 

Sounds like a plan. :)

BassDaddy

Fleer
That's writing.
I talk like Vader.
I walk like a Wookie.
https://www.urbandictiona...=true&defid=416908

One of those is my favorite Bangles song.

Denial country!

It ain't just a river in in Belgium.

Like living in a hell hole ...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a6XtEJtl2cg