ORIGINAL: tazman
I have read of issues wirh premier dealing with avi's and about Premier being slower than Vegas. Is Premier more resource hungry as far as video card, CPU, etc? Does it really have issues with some video formats?
We're trying to purchase a software solution that will allow us to grow. I like Premier so far because it seems to provide the largest amount of tools that may in the future come into play, but I am concerned about some of the issues I have read about it (stated above). Is it just a particular user's issue or are these known issues with the application?
Thanks,
Vegas vs anything...
1) Vegas is less demanding on a video card, i can runit on a laptop with onboard video. on the other hand i can run it on a system with a 285 in it and it wont be much faster.
where the vid card would help would be layers. i think Vegas is by far the slowest for renders regardless of what system its on.
2)Avid, Adobe, Edius, Liquid (the first to do GPU processing, but i would not touch it now) all will use the video card and now with CS4 Adobe has Cuda enabled.
with these the faster the video the better. (to a point)
it also depends on you 3d titling, what effects how many layers etc.
render are equal to the power you give it.
CPU and HDD are the primary render delay areas (with video falling in there somewhat)
you should use seperate drives to render to . never render to the same drive you are working on raided or not.
raid 0 i feel is an absolute must for any pro level editing (time is money)
so ideally very fast system either core i7 or Xeon
os drive
minimum pair of sata raid 0 for work/capture
minimum pair of sata raid 0 for render to.
if uncompressed real HDD things change rapidly depending on format/codec.