I think one of the reasons these discussions never go anywhere is that we're talking about totally different things. If someone mentions that in the audio recording industry Pro Tools is the standard, people will give examples pertaining to exceptions or to other fields and sub-categories altogether.
For exemple, Jim mentions his girlfriend, working on a radio show and doing her edits in Audition. I must admit that when I think of
the recording industry, I'm not thinking about people accomplishing audio work, editing, cutting and splicing
independently of other facilities. What they use is their concern only and it doesn't take away any of their professionalism.
Here's my own take on that.
Some time ago my wife recorded at Avatar studio NY (w/ a recently deceased legendary producer) = Pro Tools
The sessions continued here at The Palm = Pro Tools
The guy who wrote the music was using = Pro Tools
His assistant was using = Logic for scoring AND Pro Tools
All the musicians involved in the project had rigs with = Pro Tools (one exception, a guy with DP)
That's what I mean when I say standard. Because the word standard somehow implies that there's a chain of people working together, exchanging, and that they use some of the same tools and methods.
That doesn't make PT any better and it may in fact not be the right tool for you and me under certain circumstances. But just because WE prefer other tools doesn't mean that PT is wrong or this or that.