markyzno
X2a was stable as anything for me, albeit A FEW crashes, as was X1 and X1d and X2
X3 is yet EVEN more stable.
If Cakewalk ONLY cared about money then why have the Bakers been up on here recently givinf first class support, news and conversation with their online customer base?
It's good that X3 is " more " stable
For me X1b was ( way more ) stable than X2a
I dont say that Cakewalk don't care, but it has not been to long time since X1 to X3.
to me, it seems that changing to another version goes a bit too fast, when they should
be sure that every version was (
rock solid stable ), even before the making of a new version.
First of all, a stable and simple but yet powerful DAW, will get customer's to buy it
also people will tell about how great the product is, and recommend it to a friend
and so on it will continiue to get a good reputation, and that sell's.
When a DAW consist of "many" bug's and they change versions often, and those
new versions "also" got ( problems ) a bad reputation will start to spread around
making people start thinking about switching to another DAW
That will decrease the sale's of the product over time.
A stable DAW is very important, that product get's a good reputation and
even more and more will buy it, that way the company will earn way more, $$$$$$$$
it's all about Quality, not quantity..
Of course Cakewalk now has to be there for the customers to
fix the broken stuff, to get credibility of they'r product again
if not customers may start thinking to jump the boat
and search for another ship to board.
You will may ask why i did choose Cakewalk as a DAW !
The answer was quite simple: Cakewalk has always been an easy to navigate / use and set up, DAW