I do understand what you are saying Noel, and do appreciate, and sorry to come across maybe a little blunt in parts of my post
and for many comping is vital so glad that is finally here for many, but some of the improvements or fixes I feel in certain areas could have been done way back, many years ago, I was only voices the opinions just as many have as that don't judging from the posted I read over the years that have been constructive.
I just personally more so get a little frustrated but this is just my personal take on it, its some of the smaller bugs and things
I know it may only seem small and irrelevant to some, one being over the years all I would ask for is to be able to stretch and drag out midi event timing from the edge of an event a like you can with audio events, year in year out from v6, nothing big, but it is quite comment practice in most major daws and something so simple can be so effective in its results to come up with new patterns and rhythms, and all though only one wish from a few, its implemented for audio, so baffled at why not midi at same time, important detail missing and falling on deaf ears so to speak.
It would be nice in the future now the major over hall is in place, that a step back could be taken to also consider such things, I don't personally want stupid things or gimmicks just the extra attention to detail and these little tweaks or improvements, I never suggest selfish things, only things that as little as they are do have a real value overall, like is say my own worse nightmare wanting it all. I don't believe in that slogan about bloat ware when it comes to editing details and working enhancements, it is never enough only technology advancements or getting in-depth with how a program works can dictate that.
I guess I will have to be more constructive in the wish list section, with more detail or diagrams etc, so I will get noticed, It would be great if their where a few more interactive moderators, as seen over recent period, it just gives us a little more faith, knowing that their are go between moderator's that can do all the relaying back and too with user requests, I would not expect to have all answered as would others, but if its feasible idea, nothing wrong with a yeh! that sounds good, we will look into the principle idea, or a no its impractical etc,
A few of the big things like comping has come up and had a cakewalk member jump in, but for me its the detail that defines the program then the big things, so one can feel overlooked.
Sorry for sounding like a bit of a buffoon in parts lol, I guess I was playing devils advocate to get a reaction, But you answered and I now have better understanding of cakewalk from your words I appreciate that, its just good to know their is more forum communication its so important, I really do hate to love sonar but I do for so many reasons too. I guess I will have to put my money where my mouth is and get some good music done with sonar, instead of worrying about what I don't have or need and jumping from Daw to Daw for what it has, no daw is an Island yet lol but they are getting closer, I am going to have to compose my thoughts and decide on the X3 upgrade, I do want it, I was just hoping on a working demo by now, just to make sure the jump is needed for me at this time and I will benefit greatly enough at this time.
Thanks