I agree with the other posters.
 
Record @ 24 bit 44.1KHz and guess what?
 
All your problems will disappear

Kalle Rantaaho

Musicalguit
I know people who are truly in the music industry (not hobbyists) and the pros ALWAYS use 192.
 
Thanks. 
 

No they don't.

Absolutely. Almost nobody works at 192, in fact. It's way too resource intensive, and nobody's demonstrated a convincing benefit in double blind testing.

Musicalguit
192k at 48.

 
Youch! Missed that. Definitely a contributing factor, and not recommended... unless maybe you're recording dog whistles or gnat farts.
 
And, as others have pointed out, "48" doesn't even make sense for a bit depth. 
 

1. Questions to all above: Do you know anyone in, working for, or SIGNED to a major? - The answer is obviously no.
 
2. It doesn't matter that more and more major artists are releasing their albums as flacs to you (which allows the resolution)?
Of course not, you aren't musicians (just tech geeks who spend their lives on this forum).
 
3. If you can't hear the difference between 44.1 and 192 then you have ABSOLUTELY no business trying (pretending) to be engineers.
 
4. Pro's DO use it because they/we have the extra few grand to spend on systems capable of handling it.
 
5. Despite you spending your lives here you obviously have absolutely no understanding of what a system with my specs can do.
 
6. Thank you sincerely for not providing an actual explanation (or solution). So not only aren't you professional, you ALSO waste people's time!
 
Good job guys. Back to your wife and kids and your 9 to 5.
 

Well, clearly YOUR system cannot handle the extra load imposed by running at absurdly high sample rates.
 
And you never did answer the bit depth question. What interface that you know of is capable of 48 bit recording?

Bristol_Jonesey
Well, clearly YOUR system cannot handle the extra load imposed by running at absurdly high sample rates.
 
And you never did answer the bit depth question. What interface that you know of is capable of 48 bit recording?

 
I'm not just hitting the resource limit because as long as I don't do that specific combination everthing is fine (I can add as many prochannel effects and reverb as I like). - To as many channels as I like.
 
I'm not sure exactly what part of that you don't understand.
No doubt you didn't read it (thanks again).
 
In regards to 48 I was distracted at the time, nothing more.
 
Are you going to actually try to help now or would you like to argue more??
 
 

You really owe it to yourself & your system to just try running Sonar at a typical sample rate (44.1 or 48) and see if your problems disappear.
 
If they do you know what's causing it.
 
If they don't then you have a deeper problem which hopefully can be resolved with the collective knowledge of the forum.

Musicalguit
1. Questions to all above: Do you know anyone in, working for, or SIGNED to a major? - The answer is obviously no.
 
2. It doesn't matter that more and more major artists are releasing their albums as flacs to you (which allows the resolution)?
Of course not, you aren't musicians (just tech geeks who spend their lives on this forum).
 
3. If you can't hear the difference between 44.1 and 192 then you have ABSOLUTELY no business trying (pretending) to be engineers.
 
4. Pro's DO use it because they/we have the extra few grand to spend on systems capable of handling it.
 
5. Despite you spending your lives here you obviously have absolutely no understanding of what a system with my specs can do.
 
6. Thank you sincerely for not providing an actual explanation (or solution). So not only aren't you professional, you ALSO waste people's time!
 
Good job guys. Back to your wife and kids and your 9 to 5.
 

haha! alright.. I hope (one day when you've grown up) you will remember this post and realize how awkwardly and amazingly wrong you were about absolutely everything just wrote. :) ..
 
I won't give this thread any more of my time cuz you obviously already "know everything" and what can a bunch of nerdy nobodies help a star like you with? ;D LMAO

Oh boy. Musicalguit...
And just to make your outburst look even more embarrassing:
You did understand that nobody said nobody uses 192 kHz, didn't you?
 
You said "pros ALWAYS use 192 kHz" which is simply far from the truth.
 
Have a nice weekend.

Musicalguit we have seen your type before. Its sad really that for some reason you are unable to listen to anyone on the forum. When you figure out that you don't know as much as you think you do please come back and the forum will be here to help you. 
 
If you are of a mind please research sample rate and bit depth to find out what those terms mean. Clearly you don't have a clue.