yorolpal
Reads more like puff piece review in Electronic Musician circa 2000: Unfortunately, yes.
Thank you for citing a year when I wasn't involved with the magazine
I've thought a lot about reviews over the years. I finally came to the conclusion that no one should care whether I like something or not, because people have such vastly different needs. So my goal was to describe something with sufficient accuracy that the readers could decide whether it was something that would interest them or not. If some people read a review and thought it was positive while others thought it was negative, I figured that meant I did my job properly.
My favorite example was when I reviewed Native Instruments' Kore. One reader wrote to say that he went out and bought Kore based on the positive review, and it was the best investment he'd made in years. Another reader wanted to know if Native Instruments canceled their advertising after reading such a negative review. As to Native Instruments, they just said "Finally someone actually explained what it does."
Frankly, I just don't think it's possible to review a piece of software as deep as Sonar in a way that covers how well it works for the 4,597 ways it can be used. More and more, I think all a software review can really do is help the reader decide whether it would be worth their time to download a trial version and check it out.