jimusic
ubuntu
I've moved to Cubase 7. One of the best moves I've ever made. But I still visit this forum. Why? A mixture of nostalgia and curiosity. I've been a Cakewalk user since the previous century.
Ditto - word for word!
Ditto 3 . . . . I was always a watcher out here and did not participate much anyway (I mean look at my post count)!
My deciding factor to go Cubase was when I ran a Demo of Cubase 6.5 and did VST expression. I was hooked. I then ran a demo of Ableton live and put together 3 songs in 4 hours using Ableton then rewired it back into Cubase for mix down. And I have been a Cakewalk users since the 12 tone days. I still have the 3 1/2 inch disks with Greg Hendershott's name on them. I believe it was Cakewalk 2.0 . . . . .
It has also made it easier with my client base. All of my clients use Cubase/Pro Tools/Logic/Ableton. I was always the black sheep with Sonar and Reaper and it always took me a bit longer to get tracks set swapping files back and forth. I could not just send the project file. I had to export it to wave, or go through this painful task of exporting midi, saving fxp and fxb settings, etc. Now I have 3 of the 4 DAWs so it makes it easier to bounce Projects back and forth. It was about the workflow.
I did a lot of things in the past year I said I would not do. I sold all of my UAD last year and went native when I realized I did a project using no UAD plugs and it did not nuke my PC like I thought it would (the project barely got to 40 percent CPU use). Even more was the fact the it sounded just as good native as it did with the UAD plugs. And I was the biggest UAD fanboi ever. You're talking 8 UAD2 quads between 2 workstations and every single plugin. Luckily my timing was good because no Sonar version nor Cubase 7 are qualified hosts for UAD now (even though I know people are using UAD2 with Sonar). But I can now move projects back and forth between collaborators without worry about the person on the other end not having UAD, and that was more important than the DSP. And Waves plugins are no pushovers (even though they get a bad rap in forums). But again, it was about speed and workflow.
I went back to hardware after I said I would stay totally in the box. I got hardware Analog synths, got outboard for Mix bus compression and mastering, and got analog summing. Now mind you I still do the bulk of the work in the box (for collaboration and recall), but using hardware synths did not slow down my workflow since Ableton's Max for Live and Soundtower had editors that would allow me to use my hardware like plugins, and the hardware has made my mixes stand out in a overrun sea of ITB dance mixes.
Things can and do change. But I still lurk around both this forum and UAD more for curiosity, and because I miss it.
I guess my point is it' all about your workflow. Use what works for you. PC, Mac, Sonar, Logic, UAD, Waves, Soft Synth, Hardware Synth, Iphone, Galaxy, Izod . . . who cares! Does it work for you? Do you get what you want out of it? If so, then keep writing great tracks. After all, it's all about the music . . .
Enjoy everyone. That's probably the longest post I have ever done out here!