• SONAR
  • New graphics card to take advantage of new GPU support. Recommendations?
2010/12/14 12:17:12
SvenArne
I'm noticing that certain aspects of X1 (most notably the console view as well as the inspector) are noticably more sluggish than before. But then again my graphics adaptor is the oldest part in my computer (from 2005, I believe), so it might be time to upgrade. Which cards would be recommended to take full advantage of the new graphics enhancements?

Sven
2010/12/14 12:49:17
benstat
I'm sure you would be absolutely fine with any modern ATI or nVidia based card that is capable of running the Windows Aero user interface for Vista and Win7. Assuming you don't want to use it for anything else (like games) of course.
 
If it can run Aero comfortably, then Sonar won't stretch it much because I don't believe it takes advantage of any special GPU acceleration (yet) over and above what a normal Windows app does.
2010/12/14 13:03:16
Frank Haas
2005 ?
is it a an AGP, PCI or PCIe slot you are using ? Do you have a PCIe slot ?
What size is your monitor and what is its native resolution ?
are you sure that a new graphiccard will solve your issue ?
2010/12/14 13:08:17
Freddie H
SvenArne


I'm noticing that certain aspects of X1 (most notably the console view as well as the inspector) are noticably more sluggish than before. But then again my graphics adaptor is the oldest part in my computer (from 2005, I believe), so it might be time to upgrade. Which cards would be recommended to take full advantage of the new graphics enhancements?

Sven

 
No brainer Sven....NVIDIA forget the rest... 
http://www.nvidia.com/content/global/global.php
 
GeForce 8, 9, 100, 200, 400-series, 500-series GPUs with a minimum of 256MB of local graphics memory. GEFORCE DESKTOP PRODUCTS GEFORCE NOTEBOOK PRODUCTS GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450*
GeForce GT 440*
GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430*
GeForce GT 420*
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285 for Mac
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 220*
GeForce GT 340*
GeForce GT 330*
GeForce GT 320*
GeForce 315*
GeForce 310*
GeForce 210*
GeForce GTS 150
GeForce GT 130*
GeForce GT 120*
GeForce G100* GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9800 GTX+
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9600 GSO
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9400GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 9400 mGPU
GeForce 9300 mGPU
GeForce 8300 mGPU
GeForce 8200 mGPU
GeForce 8100 mGPU GeForce GTX 480M
GeForce GTX 470M
GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GT 445M
GeForce GT 435M
GeForce GT 425M
GeForce GT 420M
GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GTS 260M
GeForce GTS 250M
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTS 150M
GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 325M
GeForce GT 240M
GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 130M
GeForce G210M
GeForce G110M
GeForce G105M GeForce G102M
GeForce 310M
GeForce 305M
GeForce 9800M GTX
GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GS
GeForce 9500M GS
GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GS
GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GS
 
 
 
2010/12/14 13:27:57
Frank Haas
over 50% of those mentioned chipsets are for laptops..
2010/12/14 13:50:04
SvenArne
Frank Haas


2005 ?
is it a an AGP, PCI or PCIe slot you are using ? Do you have a PCIe slot ?
What size is your monitor and what is its native resolution ?
are you sure that a new graphiccard will solve your issue ?


It's a Nvidia 7600GS PCIe card. I'm not certain a new card will fix it, but I'm curious as to what Cake means by that X1 is engineered to take advantage of modern GPUs. The console wasn't sluggish inside SONAR 8.5, so I'm guessing it has something to do with the new graphics engine.

Sven
2010/12/14 13:54:21
djtrailmixxx
I reccomend this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102882
NVIDIA drivers are responsible for the majority of BSODs in Windows since Vista and now Win 7
2010/12/14 14:04:30
SvenArne
That looks interesting (and cheap and fanless) djtrailmixxx. I should mention that I'm on XP32 (but of course, won't be forever).

Have the bakers said anything specific on how the new graphics engine interacts with GPUs and which ones they recommend?

The sluggishness I mentioned seems pretty much unrelated to CPU load and project size. I have an Intel Q8550 CPU and 4GB of RAM so I should be in the clear, spec-wise.

Sven
2010/12/14 14:26:31
benstat
By coincidence, I used to own an nVidia 7600GS in my last PC. I bought it because it was the bare minimum required for supporting Aero with Vista at the time. Things have moved on a bit since then, so I'm sure you would benefit from something a bit more powerful.

However, before upgrading, have you tried updating your graphics driver. I have seen different graphics drivers make a HUGE difference in my time.

As to the difference between nVidia or ATI, I have owned mid to high range versions of both. The only significant differences, in terms of performance etc, are only really apparent when you are dealing with high end graphic apps and games. For a Windows app with no special GPU accelleration requirements, I would say you would be fine with either. I'm using ATI at the moment with no problems at all - in games or in Sonar.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account