• SONAR
  • X2 and VST3? (p.2)
2012/08/02 19:58:44
bitflipper

VST3 is right up there with "gapless audio engine" under the heading of "stuff I don't care about and am mystified why anyone would".

Not trying to start an argument...no, wait, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. C'mon, all you guys with VST3-envy. Tell me why. (BTW, the judges will not accept "it's the future" as a valid argument.)

2012/08/02 20:03:02
The Maillard Reaction

"all you guys with VST3-envy. Tell me why."


I think it's the only way I'm ever going to get my keyboard to sound like a real life saxophone.











There, I said it.

;-)
2012/08/02 20:21:27
Jonbouy
bitflipper


VST3 is right up there with "gapless audio engine" under the heading of "stuff I don't care about and am mystified why anyone would".

Not trying to start an argument...no, wait, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. C'mon, all you guys with VST3-envy. Tell me why. (BTW, the judges will not accept "it's the future" as a valid argument.)


VST3 is only important for running VST plugins that use the extra functionality of the v3 spec, other than that I think there is some improvement in how they show up automatically categorized in apps. designed to take advantage.

'Gapless Audio' or glitchless looping as I prefer to call it is a no brainer for anyone but an immaculate and manly 'Chuck Norris' of a musician such as yourself who can nail everything first time, others, including myself, given their obviously lesser, mere mortal capabilities may have to resort to a choice of alternate takes from a repeated looped section.

Not having the Audio sound like a car being driven through a plate glass window on the end of each iteration can be a much more rewarding experience when tracking.  I've found that out whilst using other current applications that seem to already be able to manage this.


2012/08/02 20:27:23
wynnsong
bitflipper


VST3 is right up there with "gapless audio engine" under the heading of "stuff I don't care about and am mystified why anyone would".

Not trying to start an argument...no, wait, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. C'mon, all you guys with VST3-envy. Tell me why. (BTW, the judges will not accept "it's the future" as a valid argument.)
I get that it won't benefit you...but it will benefit many folks...


I think it's also important to stay on the cutting edge of technology instead of always playing catch up..
Here are some highlights....keep being mystified if you must.  http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/technologies/vst3.html


NEW VST3 FEATURES


Improved performance Managing large plug-in sets and multiple virtual instruments on typical studio computer systems can often be difficult because of CPU performance limits. VST3 helps to improve overall performance by applying processing to plug-ins only when audio signals are present on their respective inputs. Instead of always processing input signals, VST3 plug-ins can apply their processing economically and only when it is needed.

Multiple dynamic I/Os VST3 plug-ins are no longer limited to a fixed number of inputs and outputs. Their I/O configuration can dynamically adapt to the channel configuration they’re inserted in, meaning that any VST3 plug-in can be surround-capable with true multi-channel processing. For example, all the new VST3 plug-ins in Nuendo 4 can work in stereo-mode when inserted into a stereo channel, but switch to 6 channels when inserted into a 5.1 channel. Each audio channel is processed independently. Interaction between channels depends on the type and design of the plug-in. In addition to their flexible audio bussing capabilities, VST3 plug-ins may also offer a dedicated event bus. Typically, this is a MIDI input for control/modulation but these busses are no longer restricted to MIDI standard only. Future plug-ins may replace the common MIDI interface with alternative methods of control.


Activating/deactivating busses A typical issue with current virtual instruments is their audio output bussing system and how they’re connected to the mixer after loading. Especially virtual samplers with multiple outputs often occupy more mixer channels than need. The VST3 interface offers the possibility to deactivate unused busses after loading and even reactivate those when needed. This cleans up the mixer and further helps to reduce CPU load.

Resizable edit windows VST3 introduces a new approach to plug-in GUIs though window resizing, allowing for extremely flexible use of valuable screen space.


Sample-accurate automation VST3 also features vastly improved parameter automation with sample accuracy and support for ‘ramped’ automation data, allowing completely accurate and rapid parameter automation changes.

Logical parameter organization The plug-in parameters are displayed in a tree structure. Parameters are grouped into sections which represent the structure of the plug-in. Parameters like “Cutoff” and “Resonance” could be grouped into a section called “Filter”. This makes searching for a certain parameters easier, such as on an automation track. This also allows assigning a group of parameters to a specific MIDI Channel input and audio output bus.


Optional VST3/SKI combination As a direct result of the modular interface design of VST3, the Steinberg Kernel Interface (SKI) can be combined with VST3 plug-ins. SKI is an additional SDK that allows extremely close integration of a plug-in with a Steinberg host application, and allows functions to be carried out almost from within the application. This extends to the ability to create tracks, copy, cut, paste or process events in the Steinberg host application. SKI is provided to selected industry partners upon request.

VSTXML for remote controllers Remote controllers for audio and MIDI software applications have become increasingly popular. With VSTXML, VST3 offers far more flexible control of VST plug-ins by remote controllers. Using the knobs and faders on the control surface, parameters can be recorded, renamed and edited in many ways. Parameters that cannot be edited can be routed for display purposes to the control surface, for example to show Gain Reduction on compressor.


UTF16 for localized parameter naming In VST3, all strings that can be displayed to the user are in Unicode (UTF16) format. Usage of this universal character base allows the host application to display characters in localized languages.

No MIDI restriction for parameter value transfers VST3 has a dedicated interface for event handling that carries a much wider range of functionality than standard MIDI events would be able to provide. This opens up a big range of opportunities for musical use cases with very high potential for innovative product design. For example with VST3 some controller events (for example, pitch) can be referred to a note event (using a note unique ID). This offers the possibility to e.g. modulate only a single note which itself is part of a chord.


Audio inputs for VST instruments The VST3 interface expands VST instruments by adding the ability to create audio input busses. As a result, audio data can be routed to an VST3 instrument. A synthesizer which has a built-in e.g. vocoder effect is able to process audio data coming in from other sources as well.

Multiple MIDI inputs/outputs Unlike with VST 2.x,, a VST3 plug-in can have more than only one MIDI input or one MIDI output at the same time.


64-bit processing VST3 plug-ins are generally able to process audio data in 64-bit.





BACK TO TOP






2012/08/03 01:22:30
bitflipper
No need to copy-n-paste Steinberg propaganda; I've already read it -- and then some.

If VST3 were an incremental improvement in the spec, I'd have no quibbles with it. But it's a major rewrite of the interface specification, most of it for no good reason other than to assure incompatibility with everything that's come before. Developers hate it. Usually when you're told to throw everything out and start from scratch, there's some kind of payoff. Resizable windows? They had to rewrite the entire spec to get resizeable windows? Solitaire has had a resizeable window since Windows 2.0, before Cubase's engineers were out of high school.

Microsoft is famous for this kind of tactic, but Steinberg, for all its pretensions of grandeur, isn't Microsoft. (How many Microsoft engineers does it take to change a lightbulb? None, they just redefine the standard as "dark" and embark on a multimillion dollar ad campaign to convince all users of "light" that they are woefully behind the times and not keeping up with the cutting edge.)

[Jonbuoy: sorry, I forgot that some people loop takes. Call me Chuck Norris if you like, but truly I do not record that way. No, I rarely get it right the first time. I might get it right on the 200th time - and that's when I hit "R" and record #201.]
2012/08/03 07:02:17
Jonbouy

. Call me Chuck Norris if you like, but truly I do not record that way.


Nor would I if I was restricted to Sonar's current ability to loop succesfully...

Automatic take lanes and glitchless looping within Sonar will be a revelation (if they get them working properly) trust me....

Regards to the original topic whether you have views on the VST3 spec or not, many plug-ins, whilst not maximising the extra functionality available, are already offered as an alternative alongside the VST 2.4 ones by many vendors anyway, the main advantages there are better plug-in management,  scalable windows and various other refinements. 

Given that there are many VST3 plug-ins available already I'd say adding support for VST3 is a cheap way for Cakewalk to add further appeal to existing users and potential customers alike.  After alll adding support for it is a much more trivial matter than designing plugs for it which is why many DAWs already support it.
2012/08/03 07:21:21
tecknot
@ Bitflipper "Not trying to start an argument...no, wait, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. C'mon, all you guys with VST3-envy. Tell me why. (BTW, the judges will not accept "it's the future" as a valid argument.)" - How about, because everyone else has it?
2012/08/03 07:21:29
tecknot
darn double post...sorry
2012/08/03 07:30:57
panup
Which VST3 effects would you guys buy if it was supported by X2?
2012/08/03 07:36:17
John
Scalable windows are a reality in VST 2.4 already. 


According to Noel VST 3 actually brings nothing new. All that was listed is doable in VST 2.4.


I personally have no problem with CW adopting it as long as they are not impeded by it in any way. That would include licencing.   


Check out Melda Audio all their plugins come in both versions with the same abilities including scalable windows. 


My only problem is Steinberg's control of it, if it does keep control. That I don't know. 


I have seen some backlash towards it though.  We shall see. 




© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account