noynekker
LJB
Busy doings tons of research as unfortunately I have to know that my DAW will always be tiptop - this is my business. It's hilarious to see that the DAWs I used to hate have mostly now incorporated all the stuff I love about SPLAT. I will never discard Sonar but I will have to crossgrade - PT12 and Cubase 9.5 Pro look both look very good. At least PT now has track freeze - hahaha!
Yes, it's a curious thing in the DAW world that Sonar always comes up as #8 in the polls . . . yet it has all the features that the other DAWs are just finally getting around to . . . eg. I was looking at Cubase 9.5, and one of their new features is a 64 bit double precision engine.
Umm.... As far as I know the core engine always was 64bit precision. It's the mixing engine that is updated. I guess that's possible because they get rid of the 32bit plugins and have go for 64bit solely.
But I must admit I am not sure about that. Anyway - All stuff is 64bit now, so that could no longer be an "hurdle" for those that want high precision in all layers of the application.
And for that 8th place. Well - I guess the landscape of DAW users has changed a bit over the years. Like it or not, the majority of users are more EDM orientated. That means the DAW's that focus more on EDM (and thus more on Loops, samples, synths and MIDI), just got sold more. Keep in mind that's no judgment about quality or creativity on my side, but only an observation.
As a result the DAW's that target those users get a higher score. In this case it's FL-Studio, Ableton and Reason that end up high in the scores. It's also the reason that Steinberg Pro is 3th (personally I think MIDI handling is better in Cubase than in Sonar, but nobody has to agree with me of course). It's simply because all those DAW's target the current user base better. And, like it or not, the number of units sold are part of the survival of those DAW's. It's just cold calculation, but far from unimportant.
I personally think that if the bakers had more concentrated on the matrix view and mad it more usable, they had a far higher score with Sonar. In my opinion dumping Project 5 years ago was one of the biggest mistakes Cakewalk has ever made. Seeing the DAW users landscape now, they would had a absolute winner in their hands (yes I still play around with Project 5 now and then. It still runs acceptable, although it clearly shows it's age). It's a shame that this never had to be.
All of this is a personal view, of course.