I mean honestly, I don't see why people have to panic?
 
If you stay with windows 7 OS Sonar would never become obsolete. Who forces you to use Windows 10?

As has been said before (a few times), I don't personally see too many people panicking - some are electing to stick with SONAR, some are electing to move on and are asking appropriate questions in helping them to make their choices. Many are doing both (sticking while looking at other DAWS). No panic here. I have decided to move on to be ahead of the curve. I initially thought I would stick with SONAR while I tried out other DAWS, then gradually switch over. I bought one I thought would work for me, and haven't used SONAR in over two weeks. I wouldn't have made this choice if Cakewalk were staying in business, but c'est la vie. I moved to W10 2 years ago when Cakewalk suggested it was quicker than Win 7 - which I also found to be the case. I would never go back to Win 7 and won't stay with SONAR even though I really liked it a lot. In the process of finding alternatives for built-in plugins, but more than getting along right now - just learning a new workflow.
  

kday
I don't see why people have to panic?

No need to panic.  But I find that I go back to 5-10% of my projects at some stage for some additional editing, extraction or something.
 
I will never create another project in SONAR unless I know for certain it is just a quick and dirty throw-away, such as removing vocals from a stereo recording, cutting a chorus out of an MP3 or something simple.  That is why I felt urgency to move on.  I had 5 projects underway. I am completing one of those in SONAR.  Two have to be in StudioOne because they are collaborations.  The other two were just getting started, so I plan to move those over to Cubase.
 

Not panicking here. A slow, smooth transition is in order for the daily driver though. I'll always use SONAR as long as my computer lasts.

cparmerlee

kday
I don't see why people have to panic?

No need to panic.  But I find that I go back to 5-10% of my projects at some stage for some additional editing, extraction or something.
 
I will never create another project in SONAR unless I know for certain it is just a quick and dirty throw-away, such as removing vocals from a stereo recording, cutting a chorus out of an MP3 or something simple.  

Yeah. I don't think I'm going to start another album project in Sonar, given the overall timeline of such things. I am going to finish everything current in Sonar, and I'm probably going to carry on using it for the audiobook editing work I do. I suppose I'll see.
 
 

I think it will be possible to keep a usable version of SONAR running for some time. Abandoning the software is unnecessary for the average hobbyist who can afford to keep a zombie system running. For a music professional, the argument is pretty much the same, if you are making and recording the music you want with the current version, you can keep doing that. You already had worked out ways to kludge your stuff into a clumsy compatibility with other DAW users or studios and those workarounds will probably still work.
 
For the recording professional, especially one operating a paying studio based on SONAR, the question is probably not whether SONAR is usable, but rather if it is any longer salable. It is very common when looking through ads and listing of recording studios to find the proud banner that this is a ProTools studio. That was never worth the price per word for SONAR users. I would hate to be the operator of a SONAR studio trying to convince his potential customers that SONAR is as good as or better than ProTools now, and trying to convince them that their projects can be loaded and tweaked a decade from now. I would expect there will even be some old customers who will want their projects ported to some new DAW once the word gets around. 

I really haven’t noticed any professionals panicking.