John
robert_e_bone
Personal preference, on that. All of my sounds run through my interface and speakers, and they sound fabulous that way.
I am just trying to get him up and running with sound, as simply as I can.
Let's get him producing sound.
Bob Bone
Right I'm trying to hold him back. Bob It is not just personal preference it is years of experience that guide my postings. Often it is recommended to disable the on board sound chip which I do not do. I have been doing it this way for as long as this forum has been around.
What I do have that many don't have is two output systems and speakers. One is for everyday sounds going through a Cambridge sound system and the other for pro audio. The two don't often interact.
The way I listed the way to get his system working is the way I do it when ever I have to install a new OS or a new Sonar or on a new computer. And it works. It is not difficult and shouldn't take a long drawn out procedure. I did not talk about using his M Audio for windows sounds at all. He can if its the only way open to him but I said nothing about it.
You have every right to your opinion but in the same way so do I. I don't need any one telling me that what I am posting is trivial. That is how your post in response sounds to me Also by posting a lengthy and unnecessary list of things the OP should do you seem to be countering my post. If my instruction are wrong or need further illumination I can respect that but your's appears to undermined by disregarding it. That is rude.
Hi, John. Please please please do not think I meant ANY accusations of you holding him back, or that I had any issue with what you had posted. I TRULY did not and do not feel that way.
My comment about it being personal preference was meant to be just that - in that folks are entirely correct to do things however it best works for THEM. Your method of having both the audio interface and the on-board sound card is EVERY bit as valid is someone else only choosing to use an audio interface for both duties. That is what I meant to convey by that comment - it's personal preference - it's certainly every bit as valid which ever way someone chooses for that sort of thing.
That post that you read the way you read was only meant to say that I was just trying to give him a set of steps to follow to get him up and running, and my comment of "let's get him up and running" was meant to be inclusive - meaning 'we the forum' collectively working on getting him going. Your steps, my steps, anyone else's steps - all working together to get him to where sound is coming out the other end of it all.
I HIGHLY regard your posts, and I also HIGHLY regard anyone's opinion on their choices for getting the most productivity out of their work flow. I did not in any way mean to come across as rude to you - and just meant to have those steps be one example of configuring things, in an attempt to give him something he could walk through and hopefully solve his issues.
I try very hard to avoid injecting adjectives in my posts, meaning that I try to offer things up with no criticism or negativity. I sincerely hope that you understand what I have tried to explain here - I am VERY happy that you also take the time to try to help folks, some of your posts have helped me.
OK? Are we cool? (I certainly hope so, because again, nothing in what I had posted was meant to be any sort of comment on the validity of your posts or anything like that).
Bob Bone