Jim Roseberry
these days you can build a nice desktop for around 500-600 dollars, thats including the cost of windows 7.
Obviously I'm a bit biased...
But even building yourself, $500-$600 bucks is a budget build.
Take $100 for Win7x64, that leaves you $500.
A fast CPU and a quality motherboard will eat $500.
you call it a budget build, I call it a 6 core 3.5 ghz AM3/ with 16 gb of ram.
your insulated case is going to run you around 80 bucks
a combo AMD 6 core CPU + ASUS Motherboard will run you 120.00
http://www.microcenter.com/site/products/amd_bundles.aspx the RAM for 16 gigs is about 130.00
http://www.microcenter.com/product/373498/16GB_DDR3-1333_(PC3-10600)_CL9_SO-DIMM_Laptop_Memory_Kit_(Two_8GB_Memory_Modules)
the Power supply is another 75.00 bucks.
your hard drive is going to run you about 60 bucks for a 500 gb.
I don't think you would agree but a higher upgrade on this offer will get you dual onboard vga/dvi graphics(which ive used and had no problems)
but even an upgrade on an entry level graphics card with dual dvi wont break the bank too much over what im saying here.
im still under 600.easy, fact, im under 500.
anyway, so here we have a 6 core CPU with 16 GB of RAM.
if this doesn't do the job, then im really not sure what we are trying to record here with sonar ?
I think the 500 CPU and Motherboard is overkill.
I know we differ in opinions, that's okay. I respect your opinion.
but you have to at minimuim respect mine.
what did you think I was talking about ?
I know your in the digital audio building business and this doesn't fair so well with sales on your end.
but truth is a lot of users are moving towards walmart and best buy off the shelf laptops and desktops.
your not going to buy something like I have presented here at wallmart or best guy for under 500/600 bucks.
and lets just say you have your copy of windows from the computer that just died, or your hard drive as well.
whats that bring the price down to ?
under 500.00 ?
say what you will but ive been using this same model for over a year now, which stared out as a test build for my customers.
and it flys,
does everything I need and at a great rate.
a couple years ago I probably wouldn't have believed this,but you know what, after testing it, benchmarking it.
more importantly, testing it with digital audio.
I learned something, I can do a lot on these computers with sonar or any other application and for what difference ?
spending 500.00 for a fast cpu and mobo compared to 200.00 for a almost just as fast cpu and mobo ??
is a 6 core 3.5 ghz w/16 gigs of ram not fast ?
it goes back to the "well those parts aren't as good/not the same quality.
sorry im not seeing it,if I did I would have no problem admitting it.
I see the problems on this forum as you do as well,I see their specs, I see I7's, I5's..i also see AMD.
if you ask someone who is using an intel (middle of the road) quad core, and ask them if its just way to slow, I don't hear that too much.
I will admit this though, if you need a daw that can run over 100 tracks and 40 soft synths,
I think your way is the way to go,its only fair I admit that I haven't had the need for 40 soft synths and 100 + tracks.