• SONAR
  • Killer new EQ Plug-In (p.3)
2013/03/29 19:51:16
Danny Danzi
Mosvalve


Danny Danzi


Mosvalve


pathos


Mosvalve


Does anyone ever use 32 bands of eq on a track? I would just record the track better.



I take it you're new to eq & recording! You'd use it for setting up your listening environment.


Well I'm no expert for sure but I'm not sure if eq'ing your monitors is a good thing to do.. Wouldn't room treatment be a better way to go for that?

Hi Bob,
 
Personally, I think monitor eq far exceeds room treatment. The reason being? I've mixed in bad rooms with no monitor flattening due to not having the tools or a choice at the time....and I've mixed in bad rooms to where all I did was correct the monitors so they were flat. Never an issue that way. So for me, monitor eq wins hands down every time. Sure room correction can be super important too, but none of that matters to me if the monitors are not right to begin with.
 
As for the 32 bands thing, I do this all the time in mastering. I have Roger Nichols eq's that are custom created for me on every new job. The eq's allow the user to add as many bands as they need. So it's nothing for me to have an eq of nothing but low to mid low freqs, another with mid to high mid freqs and then an eq with nothing but highs. I COULD just use one and have everything there....but I like the triple eq system, it just works for me.
 
So though you may never use anything like this for mixing, it can be quite helpful in a serious mastering environment. :)
 
-Danny


Hey Danny, I suppose an eq like this is useful or needed in mastering though I'm not versed enough for serious eq mastering. I know there are many opinions on the subject of eq'ing monitors and you sparked my interest in the subject. Where can I find out about eq'ing my monitors?  If eq'ing them is going to solve room issues I want to be on board with that.

Hey Bob, well eq's, effects etc...will always be subjective as well as a per person preference...so in that sense, yeah an eq like that is definitely useful to someone like me. But it's definitely not a necessity or for everyone, that's for sure. :)
 
On the monitor tuning thing, it will NOT solve room issues. That's a separate entity. I'll explain a little about it for you as well as tell you a few things you can do to take care of it.
 
If you went out today and had some big time coin and bought the most expensive set of monitors you could find, they would not be perfect. You hope they would be for the price you paid for them, but unfortunately, they need to be tuned before you can truly rely on them. When your monitors are not tuned, the decisions you make can make this the most frustrating hobby you've ever pursued.
 
Let's take a look at a small example. So you got these new monitors. You paid big bucks for them, you set them up, you mix a song and then you start listening to this mix in other places. In these "other places" you notice the mix sounds muddy with too much low end while accentuating the wrong low end. You know that other professionally recorded music sounds great on these systems, why doesn't your stuff sound good? It should sound great...I mean heck, you just bought these killer monitors right?
 
Here's what happened. The monitors you bought ARE incredible. But because of the effects of your room and the way monitors are built to push or favor certain frequencies, what you heard when you mixed was not a good representation of what SHOULD have been coming out of the monitors. This is why room correction gets mentioned so much.
 
However, if you eq the monitors to be flat, the effects of a bad room are not as intense as they would be without monitor correction. Keep in mind, there ARE rooms that will suck the life right out of your monitors....so in cases like those, a bad room can wreak havoc. But to be honest, if you are in a bed room, spare room, office, finished basement etc, forget that ugly room correction stuff. It's hideous in my opinion and not needed in most situations.
 
Monitor correction: In my opinion Bob, everyone should have a good set of monitors along with a sub. There will be people that will argue against me on that. But I'll never agree. Little nearfield monitors NEVER show you the low end they claim they can get. If you get a sub and then correct the monitors along with the sub, your issues are cut down by at least 75% or more and you will never second guess how much low end you have in your mixes.
 
So definitely consider a good set of monitors and a sub to go with them. Once you have that in place, there are several free programs you can search for on the net that you can try along with a mic and and eq that will help you dial in your monitors. Me personally? I hate this idea and of all the people that have claimed to use it while bragging about it, I've never heard any of their mixes and said to myself "I need to listen to this guy more often." So in this field, it's important to try to investigate who you may be taking advice from...myself included. If you have ever heard my stuff and think it sucks, you don't want to listen to anything I have to say. Seriously....it's important that we lead by example or shut up and leave it to people that know how to get good results that CAN lead by sound examples.
 
If you're still with me and I may have passed your "I like your mixes" tests, I would personally recommend ARC by Ik Multimedia. Again, people will fight with me about it because they believe it does not make any corrections at all. I can't say for sure what it does other than, it corrected my monitors to the point of what I hear in my studio, is what I hear everywhere after I've mixed or mastered something. Just about all the guys in the song forum here that are putting out strong mixes, are using ARC. All my engineer friends are using it and it's been one of the best tools of all time for me as en engineer.
 
Those that are NOT using ARC that are getting great results in the big leagues have professionals come out and scope their rooms. They pretty much do what you'd do with ARC....meaning, a guy comes out, he puts a mic where you sit at your sweet spot, he blows some noise through your monitors and it creates a readout on his machine. It shows where your monitors may be putting out too much low end, not enough low end, too much high end, not enough high end....you get the picture.
 
From there, you supply an eq to this guy and he sets the eq so that the graph on his analyzer reads flat. So his eq curve on the graph will look like this after setting the eq you supply: =====================
 
You NEVER touch this eq no matter what. If you move the monitors or change the room arrangement, the entire procedure will need to be redone. This is the good thing about ARC. You can do the correction anytime you want and with as many monitors as you own and you don't need to call a guy to come out. So if I were you, this is where I'd look and honest when I tell you, this is what has worked for me in both my studios as well as every studio I have worked in. The first thing I do when I work in another room is ARC the monitors and I've been golden. There have been a few guys that have been unsuccessful with ARC. So there is a small % that don't do well with it. But for me and several others, I/we can't say enough about it as it truly has made an incredible difference. I have an old ARC thread in the software forum if you search for it. It's a pretty good read that may shed some more light on it for you.
 
Good luck Bob....I hope some of this helps in your search.
 
-Danny
2013/03/29 20:31:39
bitflipper
Some have better boost characteristics than others, while some have better cut characteristics.

Sorry, I'm just a stick-in-the-mud engineer. Not the kind of engineer that twists knobs until it sounds good and then declares himself a genius, more the kind that collects schematics instead of lava lamps. Can you explain the concept of "better boost/cut characteristics" in technical terms that an open-minded skeptic might accept?
2013/03/29 20:41:07
Dude Ivey
I bought Equilibrium a couple of days ago, its awesome!
2013/03/29 21:19:05
Danny Danzi
bitflipper



Some have better boost characteristics than others, while some have better cut characteristics.

Sorry, I'm just a stick-in-the-mud engineer. Not the kind of engineer that twists knobs until it sounds good and then declares himself a genius, more the kind that collects schematics instead of lava lamps. Can you explain the concept of "better boost/cut characteristics" in technical terms that an open-minded skeptic might accept?

I can't speak for the guy that you quoted, bit but I can give you my take on that if you're curious? :)
 
Some eq's to me (UAD NEVE for example and some of the others ) though they may be the same like you've said, I really dig it when I turn a knob slightly and hear a difference. These are the types of plugs I gravitate towards. It's not that they are better, but more responsive is probably more it. Like for example, you know how we sometimes have to really jump on a Sonitus eq in order to hear something drastic? There are other eq's that don't need as much pouncing to where you hear differences when cutting or boosting subtly. I really think that's important for the way I work. Some eq's have a default Q that allows cuts or boosts to sound more drastic based on their defaults. So to the user "this is the best eq!"
 
One thing I noticed in my limited recording engineer schooling....all the big consoles like NEVE, SSL, Harrison etc all had adjustments that were instantaneous and made a difference with the slightest movement. To me, this is a necessity. All eq's may pretty much be the same other than a few little things here and there, but man it sure does suck when I have to really jump on something to hear the differences.
 
-Danny
2013/03/29 23:12:04
Mosvalve
Hey Danny I appreciate you taking the time to give me a detailed explanation. It's very insightful. I'm going to look into ARC. The area I mix and record in is fairly big. It's a little over 35 feet long by 18 1/2 feet wide with 9 foot high ceilings. I think my monitors and sub are decent. I assume arc can handle any size room. I'm sure it's worth trying. As far as room treatment I have some in the area where my monitors are on the sides behind and above. The floor is carpeted. The treatment I have has tamed the room some. There are definitely area's that are boomy, tiny etc. What is the most recent version of ARC?
2013/03/29 23:28:27
Jimbo21
I have this guy's least expensive EQ Equick and I love it. It's used for most of my track work, has only digital and linear phase modes but does have MS/Stereo options on every band. If I had the money, I'd buy this one (or, well maybe the Waves SSL bundle).
2013/03/30 08:44:12
bz2838
I download the free trial, tried it, think I'll stick to waves, I seem to get better results with them.
2013/03/30 08:48:14
dstrenz
I bought this eq too and like it a lot! Bit: I think what Brian and Danny may be referring to technically is how Q changes as a band's gain is changed. The Equilibrium manual calls them EQ Curves and emulates eq curves of several classic units and allows selecting any curve for any band (i.e. SSL, Harrison, NEVE, Pultec, etc). It adds no distortion as the emulated units do, only the curves which he derived from the schematics. The manual explains it better.
2013/03/30 10:53:34
Danny Danzi
Mosvalve


Hey Danny I appreciate you taking the time to give me a detailed explanation. It's very insightful. I'm going to look into ARC. The area I mix and record in is fairly big. It's a little over 35 feet long by 18 1/2 feet wide with 9 foot high ceilings. I think my monitors and sub are decent. I assume arc can handle any size room. I'm sure it's worth trying. As far as room treatment I have some in the area where my monitors are on the sides behind and above. The floor is carpeted. The treatment I have has tamed the room some. There are definitely area's that are boomy, tiny etc. What is the most recent version of ARC?

Hey Bob, not a problem. Just to cover both our butts....sincere apologies to the OP for somewhat getting a bit off track. Sometimes this stuff comes up and we/I seize the moment.
 
Bob, that's a big room...so to me that doesn't fall into the basic format. So you'll definitely need room correction plus something that flattens your monitors. You already have some, so that's great. ARC is going to make your monitors flat. If you get it, do the corrections with the sub on. Actually, if you DO get it, read this article I did on it. I've done several on ARC but this is definitely the most detailed. It will help you every step of the way if you decide to purchase it.
 
http://issuu.com/Wusik/docs/wsmapr201296dpi/37
 
The latest version is ARC 2. To me, it's very close to ARC 1 but a bit different. The majority of users prefer ARC 2 to ARC 1. Me, I'm still in the ARC 1 camp due to having such wonderful results with it. I'm one of those guys that believes in leaving a well-oiled machine alone. Like, I'll never upgrade my operating system on a pc. I'll go buy another pc with that OS on it and new hardware before I'll mess with something that works perfectly. Because of that, I still have just about every pc I've ever had. No more Win 95 boxes, but I got one with Win 98 SE that still purrs like a kitten with Sonar 2.2 on it and Pro Audio 9! LOL! :)
 
Anyway, ARC is really killer. In some cases, it MAY even help with room issues (so it claims) but I've never put too much stock into that because I don't know for sure what it really does. I don't believe what I read. I believe what I hear and how something works and let me tell you, for me it works. The one thing it HAS done for me is it's flattened out my monitors better than any guy with an analyzer and I can do this myself without worrying about if it was done right. If you mess up the ARC corrections, you'll know it. Best of luck. :)
 
-Danny
2013/03/30 12:14:16
ltb
Be aware there's a few bugs & issues. Make sure you get the latest release too (1.0.2b I think)

I'm still on the fence with this one. I already have many eq emu's but this has allot going for it. 
I can get it for $98.00 so I might get it to replace EQuality, which has been my go-to for basic non color eq chores (that's the one that's comparable to FabFilter's ProQ. I'm one of the few who doesn't care for the gui & prefer working with EQuality)

Maybe too pricey to purchase but I'd suggest to everyone in trying the 30 day/ no restrictions demo.

© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account