cornieleous
John
Nope. I will soon though.
Didn't know that. I struggle with the fact that you feel it so important to make a point against those of us who are not happy with X1, when you don't have it. I think we could have a far more honest discussion if we are all talking from experience.
I 've made that clear in so many posts that it should be general knowledge. Nor does it invalidate this thread. If you read the title it is asking not telling anyone anything. When I answer a post with facts its from either the manual or from posts on this forum from people that do have it and people I trust.
These people include CW employees.
When I am wrong on a point or don't know the answer I will admit my error or say I don't know.
I have tried to be as neutral about this as I can. In a way because I don't have a dog in this fight I am less likely to be emotional about.
What I see is a misrepresentation of what a feature is and ease of use issues. The fact is no features were taken out of X1 unlike Sonar 1 when it replaced Pro Audio 9. The audio edit window was removed. This was a full audio editing feature including a draw tool. Also the ability to make Studioware panels was remove as well as the Cal editor. That is removing functionality. Changing a GUI but leaving the complete feature set from the past version is not removing features. Sonar 1 was a total GUI change with a loss of real features. I don't need to have the program to delineate those differences.
Further, this thread is not what I think but people posting examples of a feature being removed and a response that I believe will show no such feature was removed. This being done by explaining how to get that feature working for them.
When I get X1 I will be far more able to give my impressions of it which I have so far not done anywhere.
I am hoping that this thread will be helpful to all in clearing up some of the information being spread.
Also a lot of posters have given their verdicts on X1 without having it. I have not done that.