markyzno
The video export functionaility in Sonar would be a welcome improvement to my workflow also.
I understand your feelings, but why do you want an audio app rendering video? If you are working for someone, scoring to picture, dealines are usually very nasty. Unless Sonar could create a "upload friendly" picture file like QT in the same amount of time it spits a stereo wav, I would not use it.
It just makes more sense to me to have an old computer laying around doing your video chores, uploading and dloading, leaving you to work on the main task at hand, composing to picture.
The secret hidden power of Sonar (at least for me) is in the final stages of the whole process. Sonar mixes down stems and can create a time stamped OMF that I can send to be mixed into Protool sessions quicker than I can say "Boo". I'm kinda happy with the way Sonar does this stuff. I hope the bakers stay out of the video end....and I work with pic every day of my life.
@ Mike...yes i get the same requests lately...put the music into the file for the client. I hand off the project to a audio mixer at this point. Some (most) of the audio mixers i have worked with are looking for work these days, so I throw them a bone. It is a good business practice all the way around. I "dropbox" them stems and the Original Picture file. The audio mixer will do a quick mix, put a nice final touch on your music and send the final product to the client. This does a couple of things...things sound better, keeps a audio mixer working and opens up the audio mixer to reccomend you for other jobs. Can cost you anywhere from $35-$200 depending on the budget, but it can be the best marketing money you will ever invest. Keep those audio guys on your side.