• SONAR
  • Electronic Musician… (p.13)
2013/02/17 23:50:19
Jeff Evans
John I get your point about defending your name but really who cares. Nearly everyone here knows who the good people really are (Craig included) so they don't have to waste time defending their name. There is always going to be somebody who does not like something about someone and takes a shot. Do you have to get all huffed about it though. Hardly, just ignore it and move on.  That is what the thick skin thing is all about I suppose. And move on with some interesting ideas instead. If you really believe in what good you are doing no amount of bad stuff should have any effect. If someone is saying bad things about someone else or taking pot shots no amount of name defending is going to change that. That is why it is silly to get drawn into that. That is how they are and we should just accept it.  

Forums are full of people who don't make the most of them and get too involved in other less useful stuff. You are delusional if you think you are going to rid an entire forum of those people. If you keep things ideas based those people eventually die off and go away because in the end they are not just contributing anything useful. Ideas win out every time. That is what Eleanor Roosevelt said and I think they are great words. 

I am sorry (to John and Craig) if my post seemed to criticise Craig. It was not intended to do that in fact the opposite. I think Craig is very professional and a bit above all that actually, that was what I was trying to say. (probably phrased it wrong) He is a great educator and as an educator myself I certainly admire him. I have learned a lot from him, and read a lot of his books etc. (Still have the that book Midi for Musicians! And anyone who can sit on the same panel as Dave Smith, Tom Oberheim, Alan Parsons and Jordan Rudess and George Duke has to be pretty OK in my book!)

Bub has been talking ideas mostly actually, and I like him for it. It is some others that are talking too much about people. I agree with John in that the forum overall is a very good thing I really believe that it's main purpose is to serve us. I think it does pretty well don't you agree! There are some great people on this forum. Danny Danzi has got be one of the best! Now there is an ideas person. Never talks about people much but ideas never stop coming. It is OK to talk about people if you are saying nice things about them!
2013/02/17 23:55:46
sharke
Calm down everyone. 



2013/02/18 00:13:03
musicroom
I wonder if Cake dropped X2 and went in another direction if it too could then become as loved as 8.5. Until then and for the record, I loved it first! 

:)
2013/02/18 01:25:45
Anderton
Jeff Evans


The thread should be about ideas and not people. It is the silly people who keep it on track re people.

John I get your point about defending your name but really who cares. Nearly everyone here knows who the good people really are (Craig included) so they don't have to waste time defending their name. There is always going to be somebody who does not like something about someone and takes a shot. Do you have to get all huffed about it though.
 
Jeff, I enjoy your posts because you engage in discussions, while presenting reality-based opinions. You understand how to use, and contribute to, a forum.
 
This thread was never about ideas. Its premise was to unearth an article that hit the newsstands in late November/early December 2012 and was written in October 2012. Why? Was it attempt to educate people? To present ideas that would help Sonar users? To lodge a valid complaint to try to rally people to support getting the bakers to change something?
 
No. It was strictly to stir up crap. Other people, not realizing the thread was based on a faulty premise, jumped on the bandwagon. Around post #15 I thought I better say something, so I did. I said Bub wasn't bad, that he simply didn't do his research, which I have to do because, well, I write things and put my name on them. Then I gave factual, idea-based, refutations involving quotes from actual forum members from around the time the article was written to address the initial post. My last sentence in my initial post was admittedly snarky, but I wasn’t going to let the phrase “we all know the article is inaccurate” get off scot-free.
 
Anyone with integrity would have said "Okay, I get it, I didn't realize the circumstances around which the article was written." And no apology would have been necessary or even make sense, because the original premise would have been based on not understanding something, instead of taking a cheap shot in the form of a personal attack.
 
I’ve been moderating forums for 18 years and on BBS systems for over a decade prior to that. Moderators classify people like GlennP as the archetypal “can dish it out but can’t take it.” He never responded to my posting of facts; he just distanced himself from his initial premise, and descended into ad hominem attacks while feigning superiority. I’m not attacking him by saying this; read his posts. I’m summarizing.
 
As to defending my name, the only “product” I have is credibility because without that, reviews, articles, videos, recordings, etc. mean nothing. If GlennP came into a forum and said he was at a restaurant where the waiter urinated in his soup and that never happened, you can bet that restaurant would be out there defending itself. Some people don’t know who I am, and might actually believe his premise was valid.
 
I can handle posts that exemplify condescension, but I feel only a bully would make a statement like this: “I state this because it seems to me that a significant number of forum members (like backwoods and jb101) think it’s a toy to fill in the hours of an unfulfilled existence. Too much spare time they have, because they no longer can make it as a muso. You need to stop and realise that you are emotionally and artistically crippled and all that is left for you is to play with yourself in your bedrooms and pretend… Oh what might have been… If only…”
 
I don’t like bullies.
 
When I see one, the Mongol blood in me rises to the surface (yes, there’s Mongol blood in there).
 
My brother had cerebral palsy and this bully named Jack like to attack him physically. Jack was a sports guy, strong and also, evil. He was 16, I was 10. One day I couldn’t take it any more. I beat the living crap out of Jack until he was bleeding from places he probably shouldn’t have been bleeding. I wasn’t stronger, but I had motivation...like those women who lift up a car that pinned a child. He never attacked my brother again. Or me, for that matter. I still don’t know how I managed to beat him up. And I’ve never gotten in a physical fight since.
 
But it left me with a very, very, very strong dislike for bullies that I carry to this day.
 
If people think I’ve sullied my reputation as a nice guy because I decided to take on someone for making a personal attack, I cannot disagree. I try whenever possible to take the high road. But if someone challenges me to a duel, I reserve the right to accept. And when he bullies other people in this forum, I will definitely accept.
 
However, I also need to say one more thing. You won’t be seeing as much of me here soon, and I didn’t want anyone to think that some of the people were sufficiently toxic to negate all the wonderful, knowledgeable, and helpful people who make up the majority of this forum, and therefore draw the erroneous conclusion that they drove me away. Far from it. There has been a major change in my life; the press release will be going out this week. I will be involved for the foreseeable future in spearheading a world-wide educational initiative involving music, and it will take up a lot of my time. I'll still write articles, give lectures, and perform because that’s actually part of my job description. And I’ll still take “quick glances” here to gauge which subjects need to be covered in articles like my Sonar column. But, my time will be at even more of a premium than it is now. There is much to do, and more years behind me than ahead of me, so I need to get moving.
 
Finally, for the record...I have zero doubt that if Bub and I were sitting in a bar, we’d have some great conversations.
2013/02/18 01:55:55
pbognar
Anderton


vintagevibe


Anderton


Admittedly, it is difficult to reason people out of positions they didn't use reason to attain. 
That's the best quote I've seen in a long time.  I should put it in my signature!

Glad you liked it
 
Actually you're a fine example of someone with a realistic view of Sonar and software in general. FWIW, my "Staff View remains primitive" under the reviews "Cons" section is an hommage to your comments, and was directly inspired by same. I do pay attention to the negatives; for many people, Staff View is a big one and is worth pointing out. Just because it doesn't matter to me is irrelevant; it matters to some people, and therefore needs to be mentioned.

Wow - glad I didn't stumble onto this thread until now - it would have messed up my weekend.


I've re-read the EM review (this was back from mid-December, and there was no X2a patch yet).  It short and succinct and factual.


I recall my reaction to X2:


1)  "Cr@p - another major release and and Staff View gets no love - I'm not upgrading until we get some SV love" (thanks for pointing out the primitive SV in each of your reviews).  


2) Seeing the list of features and fixes in X2 and not being entirely impressed

3) Seeing this video and thinking - "they did put some nice things in here"  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3eeSD9uPqw


4) A generally positive response to the X2 video on the forum

5) General X2 love with some folks having issues

6) X2a patch is released and Sonar works much better for some and much worse of others

7) Hoping that X2b will make things stable for those having issues (Sonar issues, that is)


8) The forum melting down a couple of times due to trolls and frustrated users

I'm assuming that a majority of users are able to be productive on X2a.  Genuine posts on the forum are from those currently having problems, either because of user error, drivers, hardware issues etc. or from new or existing users testing the waters to see if it is safe to come into the X2 water yet.

I hate to see personal attacks here.  At the same time, I believe it is ok to hold Cakewalk up to a certain standard.  

What Cakewalk have released is a complex piece of software which is functional on what is considered to be a typical DAW hardware / software environment.


What is needed is a version of that software which is a little less sensitive to environments which deviate from typical, addresses some documented bugs, and has an improved Staff View (sorry, that last one if for the vocal minority...)

[sorry Craig - didn't know you were posting while I was prattling on.  I pretty much hold the record for being a thread killer]
2013/02/18 03:31:29
chuckebaby
has anyone forgot cakewalk let's us use this site to sovle our issues.
or is it because a web page opens up on your computer display we automatically think its our forum where you can stand up on our perch and exersize your freedom of speech acts.

anyone here like to see another section of this forum opened up for complaints?
maybe call it..i dont know...Complaints.

there's just too much random garbage spewed in with sonar x1/x2 threads now.it used to be for legit questions for users to ask questions and get help.
so what happen?
i think its whats happening in a lot of places not just here on this forum.
its called respect.respect is little and far between now a day.
you used to have to earn respect.that doesnt even seem to work anymore.

i had a very productive night tonight,i know alot of you might not want to hear it but i finished tracking and mixing my new song(i just posted it in the forum"Jack it up") for over 6 hours straight.i didnt have one problem.not one.
now i know x2 isnt perfect but i think its far from having people claiming its broken.
that is a very harsh word to use.
to me broken means..it dont..at all...its broken.
now if you use the word,not working properly..that goes long way with me.cause i can understand that,i can also understand i might not be using some of the same features as some of you and there for things im not using,im not noticing
but G-dm it.
ive spent over 20 hours this past week on 5 songs.
the worst that happen to me was "sonarpdr.exe was running so i couldnt open up sonar.(i imagine it was because the way i closed a project or something.) so rebooted and was back in bizz.

i think craigs story in electronic musician is true in even present day.
there are a lot of users out there having good luck with it.like me.
PRV,groove clips,midi,audio,audio snap,take lanes(even though i hate them)im doing alot on it.

the one thing i think really needs attention is the staff view..why because i use it? no,i ive never used the staff view,i cant stand it.
but a lot of other users seem to have concerns so im putting my head out there and hoping the best for you.

i think we have a lot of fun here at this place.
but i do think sooner or later if the big dogs are poping in reading our threads are going to say one thing "Are we paying for this forum" ?
there going to say its an eye sore and remove it.

think about it,if you were someone up there in roland managment reading this forum,would you let it go on?

there will always be new users,its a buisiness.
dont think because youve had 5 paid upgrades your family.its a buisiness.
for some x2 is running and running well,now you might say well what about these people here on the forum?
the large number of users that dont have problems are not here on the forum..how do i know this?
because ive been using cakewalk since pro audio 9 and i only joined this forum 2 years ago.

there was no need to start this thread like you did glenn.
if your miserable in life,go find another hobby.
or learn to discuss a topic in a more mature manner.

2013/02/18 03:55:58
Bristol_Jonesey
Anderton



However, I also need to say one more thing. You won’t be seeing as much of me here soon, and I didn’t want anyone to think that some of the people were sufficiently toxic to negate all the wonderful, knowledgeable, and helpful people who make up the majority of this forum, and therefore draw the erroneous conclusion that they drove me away. Far from it. There has been a major change in my life; the press release will be going out this week. I will be involved for the foreseeable future in spearheading a world-wide educational initiative involving music, and it will take up a lot of my time. I'll still write articles, give lectures, and perform because that’s actually part of my job description. And I’ll still take “quick glances” here to gauge which subjects need to be covered in articles like my Sonar column. But, my time will be at even more of a premium than it is now. There is much to do, and more years behind me than ahead of me, so I need to get moving.
 

Craig, I sincerely hope everything works out for you in your new venture - it sounds like a fantastic opportunity and one well suited to your unique combination of skills.

I'm glad to read that you're still planning on writing your SOS column - this has been a lifesaver for me on more than one occasion in the past.
2013/02/18 04:05:23
LJB
A quick glance at my current projects, and most of me concurs that X2 is indeed pretty decent, save a bug or two. Works over here.
2013/02/18 05:57:37
Grem
Well said Craig. 

Good luck in your new endeavors. 
2013/02/18 07:19:56
The Maillard Reaction


Good luck with the new endeavors Craig!!!



best regards,
mike
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account