daveny5
Most people don't use input monitoring anyways because even with asio drivers the small amount of latency sounds wierd like a flangy/chorus.
Not my experience. With my Delta44, I get about 5.8ms latency and its usable and it sounds fine. Even though that's an old audio interface, its still a lot better than the built-in sound chips that come with the computer. If that's what you're using, that could explain the deteriorated sound you're hearing.
My specs arn't there for my benefit. Just saying...
No deterioration in sound mentioned. Mentioned latency on the input monitoring. Sounds like a delay set up with a very quick echo time causing an almost chorus like effect. I bet if I checked your interface on your computer I could hear input monitoring latency no problem. Bugs most people.
My point was that when using an onboard sound card input monitoring is useless because of the horrible latency of the drivers used wih these cards. I think now onboard sound cards even support asio. When I was using them I had to use mms as driver mode. But regardless, input monitoring is not needed. Most people don't even use it even with a good sound card because even at a latency of 5.8ms it is easily detectible and felt. Maybe it's ok for like a reverb set to 100 percent wet or a delay. But that's about it.
Do you use input monitoring? You have to turn it on per track. So like you can hear effects in the effects bin on your input? Like your mic?
But regardless, input monitoring is not needed to record.