Bub
brconflict
It does sort of surprise me as well about the fact that Roland attaches their name to this, not that this is anything against either company. Roland is pretty impressive with its forward-thinking (at least, historically). Roland's investment in Cakewalk tells me that we should expect some better improvements in product lines in the near future.
With that said, yes, if Roland is invested in Cakewalk, then the forum version upgrade should have been a no-brainer. I can't speak for Roland or Cakewalk, but someone may have made a conscious decision not to upgrade the forum software.
Now is a good time to revisit this. It's Q1 of 2013, when most new budgets are in play. Two things I want to see from Cakewalk as a result: 1) Spend more time and money to better test and squash bugs before the software (Sonar) hits the shelves, and 2) Upgrade the forum. I personally don't need "new" features. I want the bug-squashing to actually catch up to the innovation for once.
I think the state of Sonar with all the bugs, especially the long standing ones, and the state of the forum software, are a good indication of how things are run there.
I've always wondered if there is a revolving team of people that work on Sonar's code that just move on after a couple of years and someone else picks up the ball and is left to deal with the code issues, and that's why bugs don't get resolved. You know what I mean, too many chef's spoil the pot type of thing.
Cakewalk and Roland have been teamed up for quite a few years now, I doubt you're going to see anything change.
Yes, I agree. I can't speak to the actual employment landscape there, but they're going to be feature-rich with bugs, or feature-less with stability at this price-point and I'm sure the priority lays with bringing something big and new to every trade show.
(Sorry I changed the subject but, ) My opinion has been that I would pay $800 - $1,200 for Sonar, if Cakewalk would produce a version that has either direct Dev version support, or goes through a much more rigorous and extended resource/hardware/driver base to better test and squash bugs, even long-standing. The current method of bug-reporting/tracking isn't what I would have hoped. Most of them aren't, though.