I was chuckling reading this thread and thought, "Wow, what a thread... sort of like cutting yourself and then jumping into a tank full of sharks :)"

mettelus


I was chuckling reading this thread and thought, "Wow, what a thread... sort of like cutting yourself and then jumping into a tank full of sharks :)"

Only the shark tank option is probably safer.

1. But are you really telling me that incredible all goes well. It is a cult?

Of course its a cult and our God is Greg Hendershott. Oh wonderful one don't lay waste his abode and send pestilence his unworthy way. We beseech you. Amen!

P.S. maybe a little hardship would do the trick.

Nah, its no cult. Not yet, anyway.

Its a forum last time I looked which is just now. 

Mr Ax Hole 59,
 
Thank you for sharing that wisdom, ..... I guess.

im laught !!!!
what a creepy boy !!

Personally i think Ambrionics was a better topic

Wookin Pa Nub in all dee long paces, wookin pa nub...

I'm Buckwheat, amemba me?

Bob Bone

Lol!

Oh, yeah, I forgot that you can't even quote someone here on firefox, but what's new. Anyways.... @ "what software is perfect": I've never understood this. It's as if you are saying it shouldn't be fixed. @ updates: It's been long enough. My issues are confirmed so it's not like I'm just whining as some like to put it. I mean, months is too long. @ "why did you buy it": Stupidity? I'll admit it. @ article: I have no clue, but I stopped reading those years ago. They most certainly are general and too positive. Since software does indeed have issues, how about actually fixing it? Not gonna brag about others that have been updated and work fine now but I have others that have been updated and work fine now. Thanks reaperliveS1 :D Oh, and sorry for thing not being nice and separated, but cake can't even get the forum to work properly.

chrisharbin


Oh, yeah, I forgot that you can't even quote someone here on firefox, but what's new. Anyways.... @ "what software is perfect": I've never understood this. It's as if you are saying it shouldn't be fixed. @ updates: It's been long enough. My issues are confirmed so it's not like I'm just whining as some like to put it. I mean, months is too long. @ "why did you buy it": Stupidity? I'll admit it. @ article: I have no clue, but I stopped reading those years ago. They most certainly are general and too positive. Since software does indeed have issues, how about actually fixing it? Not gonna brag about others that have been updated and work fine now but I have others that have been updated and work fine now. Thanks reaperliveS1 :D Oh, and sorry for thing not being nice and separated, but cake can't even get the forum to work properly.

I guess it depends on how hard you try to solve your own problems. I am able to quote you well enough. 

But I'm not sure exactly what you are saying. You have a lot of @s in your post that mean nothing to me.

Now I do get the point about fixing bugs. What you need to consider is do you really think that the membership of this forum are in anyway opposed to that? That you are saying in effect we want bugs? 

It seems to me that you are talking to fellow members on a peer to peer forum and accusing us of insanity. That we want bugs for reasons I don't think you can stipulate. 

The OP has written a nonsense post that accuses Cakewalk of suborning perjury in the form of false statements from magazines. Did you really think we would except that on face value and not comment on it as being "off the wall".

I hope the OP of this thread has better defenders come to his defense. You did not advance his cause at all.