What I'm about to type isn't intended to imply musicians get what they deserve. It's just something that jumps out at me every time I see something like this, regardless of the specific industry/group being vilified for greed, tax avoidance, etc.
Skimming the article and primary link to numbers, all I see are REVENUE numbers. No cost is shown that I could find. Nothing about capital at risk.
It's entirely possible (and it happens a lot) to have huge REVENUE numbers and still lose money in process. What would be really interesting to me are PROFIT numbers along with how much capital was at risk.
This would give a better picture of who is making what and who is doing the heavy lifting financially to make PROFIT possible, if PROFIT even exists.
Just sayin' ... there is a TON of lazy financial "reporting" happening these days.