There are several strategy for backup: 1) physical disk copy ( Clonezilla or other Linux solutions) Pro.: does not depend on what is copied, so complete independence from the OS(es) on the disk (no OS compatibilities issues by definition). Also it does not depend from the backup software at all (can be restored using any Linux, probably in 30 years as well ;), restoring particular files requires Linux skills Cons.: the backup size is ALWAYS the size of the disk (so, it is slow and takes a lot of space), requires reboot for backup (can not be used from Windows). 2) disk/partition copy with unused blocks suppression (all mentioned programs) Pro.: in case of Clonezella, does not depend on particular Windows version (while see cons), the backup size is equal to the used part of the disk Cons.: depends on the file system, so there can be some Windows dependent issues (while sine Win Vista time I have not seen any), depending on software, it can be impossible to restore separate files, quite slow operation. 3) file system incremental backup (Acronis, Ghost) Pro.: writes all changed in separate files, so is normally fast, separate files can be restored Cons.: Windows version dependent, each software does that very proprietary way, if some backup in a chain is broken the restore can be problematic (for that, the software makes periodic complete backup) 4) file based backup (mentioned Windows 8 way, some other can do that as well) Pro.: only required file are saved, so only small backup space is required, any version of any file can be restored Cons.: it is impossible to restore complete working system, very OS specific When I want to be sure "I have it", I use (1) For situation when I am ready to loose one day of changes (at home) I use either (2) or (3) For "production" environment I use (3) + all files on RAID 1/5 (well... really I use RAID10 on 20 disks, but that is not for music ;)