It's one of those new-fangled "crowd sourcing" design services where you can pay a few hundred bucks to host a design contest for, say, a logo, and designers will submit their entries and then you select a few and you get a few revisions and then eventually you pick a winner and they get the bucks.
Their "silver" logo design package is $500. You submit a few details about what you're looking for and hopefully the contestants will actually listen to your requirements and design something great around it. Or maybe not. Here's the dilemma. If you offer a "guaranteed prize," you're going to get more designers and maybe the better quality ones, but there is no money-back guarantee. You're paying the $500 no matter what, even if all of the submitted designs are crap. If you need the money-back guarantee, you're not offering a guaranteed prize and so it's likely that fewer designers will want to take part (and they're likely to be the less experienced ones).
I'm looking for a new company logo and I've been browsing a few "pro" logo designer's websites and I have to say, I'm always a little disappointed by their portfolios. It seems like everyone has this generic style these days and all of their designs look the same. Maybe it's a consequence of them all using Illustrator and all utilizing the same techniques. So I figure maybe if I go with 99 Designs, maybe I'll end up with something a little more unique simply by virtue of the number of designers who are let loose on the project.
Then again, I'm kind of a little uncomfortable with this whole crowd sourcing idea. While it sounds kind of cool for the customer, I can't help but feel bad for the designers who put loads of work into a contest but end up with diddly squat. Yeah I know, that's the nature of the game, but I'm quite soft in the head, so there it is.
Thought(s)?