This subject has been widely discussed here: the limitations of Sonar regarding the use of videos.
What I can not accept is how these problems were not resolved after so many years.
Maybe because most users do not work with videos.
But still, many users work with videos every day, including me. I often receive
MP4 files as work material.
Some people may say that Sonar is not a video editor. I agree! And it should not be. But Sonar should at least be good at least
playing the videos.
But not.
Today I'm forced to work in parallel with Adobe Premiere because:
- Sonar is too slow to play a project when I specify Trim-in time. The further forward, the longer it takes to start play. This makes its use impracticable. The odd thing is that if I do not set the trim-in time, Sonar plays the project quickly anywhere.
- HMFS placement is inaccurate. For example, in a project with timecode at 24 FPS, using a video that shows its own timecode, the Sonar timecode almost never matches the video timecode. Sometimes Sonar shows a frame forward or one back, rarely shows the correct frame.
- Still in the example above, the MP4 videos I get have exactly 5 seconds of title and technical details, and the video timecode starts at zero from 5 seconds. If I set trim-in time at 00:00:05:00, Sonar shows my original video timecode sometimes at 00:00:00:03, sometimes at 00:00:00:05.
The problems above never happen in Adobe Premiere. And again, I do not want Sonar to be a video editor, but at least make it easy to play videos correctly.