• SONAR
  • does "console emulato" emulate crosstalk?
2012/10/30 12:42:53
pwal
as per title -- does the new x2 console emulato emulate the analog crosstalk in analog consoles? tia
2012/10/30 13:40:50
scook
I have not read anything about it emulating crosstalk.
2012/10/30 15:04:14
Beepster
I think they discussed that in the X2 webinar. Not certain on that though. Check the stickies for the vid. Might be something on the blog about the CE too. Cheers.
2012/10/31 01:59:47
soens
Interesting question though I don't see how it could as cross talk is a physical phenominom caused by electric circuitry and has always been undesirable. Though I'm speaking out of sheer ignorance of the CE plug I do know engineers have spent decades and mega $$$ trying to get rid of it... and now you want it back?
 
 
.
2012/10/31 02:13:23
John
soens


Interesting question though I don't see how it could as cross talk is a physical phenominom caused by electric circuitry and has always been undesirable. Though I'm speaking out of sheer ignorance of the CE plug I do know engineers have spent decades and mega $$$ trying to get rid of it... and now you want it back?
 
 
.


I am happy with digital yet for some unknown reason people want all the distortion and noise of analog. I'm not sure I will ever understand that. 

Now we have people paying big bucks for analog sounding plugins. So your point is very well taken indeed. 



2012/10/31 02:28:48
Danny Danzi
John


soens


Interesting question though I don't see how it could as cross talk is a physical phenominom caused by electric circuitry and has always been undesirable. Though I'm speaking out of sheer ignorance of the CE plug I do know engineers have spent decades and mega $$$ trying to get rid of it... and now you want it back?


.


I am happy with digital yet for some unknown reason people want all the distortion and noise of analog. I'm not sure I will ever understand that. 

Now we have people paying big bucks for analog sounding plugins. So your point is very well taken indeed. 

Funny you mentioned this, John. I posted something on another forum that's pretty close to what you're talking about here when someone made a comment about "vintage gear". Here's what I said:
 
I never quite got the whole vintage thing. You set up a sound....you record it....it's either good or it isn't. This whole "vintage" thing is just a darkness of sorts with saturation really. I think a lot of the problem is people give digital a bad name when in reality, analog was assisting them in getting better tones. Digital is unforgiving. If you don't pay attention to what you're recording, you fail. To me, digital is so much easier, I don't have a problem doing a vintage sound if I need to. It starts with the print, ya know?

You want vintage tones, you use vintage gear for your instruments. Gimme a an old Fender amp and a strat or tele and I'll give you vintage without any plugs. You have to know what the sound of "vintage" is before you attempt to replicate it. Want vintage drums in a room, you mic up a set of Gretsch or old Ludwigs using more room, less compression, 0 limiting and no specials on any of the drums. Don't layer instruments...leave things big, open, breathy and with room in between. Don't use the pricey mics that were made for "today's times" that make things so clean and clear.

That's all vintage is to me. Breathing room where the instruments can sing and be themselves without synthetic artifacts or insane triple tracking/hybridding or exciters. Vintage is raw, real instrument recording at its best to where you take the time to get it right or you don't print it. It can't be duplicated with a sim like it can the real thing. I just have never needed outboard gear to get that sound other than the outboard gear musicians use to cop their tones. The key is "copping their tones" if they are indeed "vintage."

 
Compare an old classic rock album to what we have today. Besides loudness in the modern album, what do you hear? More sub lows...more high end sizzle. Take away the subs below 45-50 Hz on a modern recording, take away the excessive tracking, remove 12 k and above just right, increase mids and instant vintage tone. Sure, you may want to use some sort of saturator or tape sim if you need to, but honest, this whole "vintage" thing in my opinion is more hype and a lack of understanding really.
 
I'm like you, John. Happy right where I am. However, if someone goes on an analog crusade and it works for them, it's all good. I'll never go back and don't miss any of it. But when I get a band in here that wants that sound, I've never had a problem giving it to them. It's all in the tracking anyway and the players of course. :)
 
-Danny
2012/10/31 03:18:15
John
Danny its like where have you been? Your whole understanding is so right that its scary. 
2012/10/31 04:48:40
maximumpower
This is from the Console Emulation documentation:

The Console Emulator module is based on the following principles:
  • Input transformer emulation, which introduces hysteresis and frequency dependent saturation. 
  • Frequency response shaping of the channel. 
  • Bias drift of the active stages. 
  • Component tolerance simulation by slightly changing the filter's values in the different channels. 
  • Saturation of the mix bus. 
  • Crosstalk on stereo buses. 



I am glad you guys are bringing up the analog vs digital thing. When I used to record in analog, I did whatever I could to get rid of the effects from the above list of "features". I guess digital made it sound too good lol 
2012/10/31 07:24:22
soens
  • Crosstalk on stereo buses. 
 
As I said. I speak from sheer ignorance... How might one meaasure this?
 
 
Steve
2012/10/31 07:30:05
Danny Danzi
soens


  • Crosstalk on stereo buses. 
 
As I said. I speak from sheer ignorance... How might one meaasure this?
 
 
Steve


As do I Steve with the sheer ignorance.....why on earth would anyone even want crosstalk in a mix? That to me...is so going backwards. They can call it analog, vintage or whatever else they choose to call it. I've tried my entire life for clean, clear mixes without these artifacts. For some odd reason, people are sold on that stuff sounding better. I have no quams with that if that's a person's opinion. However, I'll surely never buy into it. To me man, every album I've heard that was recorded analog TODAY has sounded absolutely horrible and actually picked up more of those digital artifacts we that are ITB actually hate. Foo Fighters last attempt is a perfect example of horrible in my opinion. If that's analog, keep me away from it. LOL!
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account