Thanks, Harpman.
X2 incorporated a huge number of fixes to a number of things that have been awry for quite a while. I will also say that I believe - so far - that X2 certainly outperforms X1, and that even beyond that that the corporate decision to completely redesign the user interface - (X1) show a complete and total commitment to the user experience.
Being in IT myself for about 38 years, you I am sure have seen time and time again where management refuses to fund things like redesigned user interfraces, because they believe it adds no functionality. And yet, Cakewalk flew in the face of that to completely rework the UI for X1, precisely for purposes of opening up the product to a wider consumer base - regular folks - who would find it MUCH easier to get things done with less of a learning curve.
X2 does have some bugs - all software does - but the very fact of seeing the CTO pop into a user thread on a weekend MORNING shows the level of effort they are putting into getting things right.
I have already completed some seriously complex projects in X2, with no problems whatsoever, and am quite happy to have it on my desktop.
On an unrelated note, I too have the Presonus AudioBox 1818VSL interface, and love it. I am curious about you taking your computer on gigs. Are you talking using it for performance or for doing live recordings? I ask because if you are using it for performance, I would suggest you check out a piece of software from a company called Brainspawn, called Forte. It is a VST hose shell, like an electronic rack, and I have used it for years for live performance. It supports really sophisticated layering of all kinds of soft synths, with effects, and is a dream.
Anyways - give X2 a good shaking - I think you will like it,
Bob Bone