• SONAR
  • ACCESS TI and sonar X1 expanded (p.6)
2012/10/02 07:33:07
Heroics
So I see it corect ? Like stated in ACCESS forum ? SONAR X1 is NOT compatible with ACCESS TI?


what a nice surprise !


you got another on elike this ?


Cause I aint laughing no moe





kind regards 


ari

(in the name of maybe a whole country which WAS thinking about getting SONAR ..........

BUT  Issues with TI access????????

Its a nO go !


2012/10/02 07:36:24
Heroics
well at least the recording is tight and right on spot if you let X1 first glide over an empty midi bar while bouncing to audio .......its not perfect !

It should also work if I start recording right at the start of the midi data ........
Heroics


So I see it corect ? Like stated in ACCESS forum ? SONAR X1 is NOT compatible with ACCESS TI?


what a nice surprise !


you got another on elike this ?


Cause I aint laughing no moe





kind regards 


ari

(in the name of maybe a whole country which WAS thinking about getting SONAR ..........

BUT  Issues with TI access????????

Its a nO go !



2012/10/02 08:37:52
Mystic38
So, I hope you realise it is common, accepted and standard practice for the last 20 years for a project with midi information for the track to actually start at measure 2...

ALL midi gear (including the virus) takes time to sync to a host and frequently there is significant control & setup information being sent from a sequencer to the synth... patch changes, part volume & pan levels, RPN, NRPN and modulation information. having this information being dumped at the same time as note information can cause problems.


To close, there are no issues with latency or midi event timing with the Virus Ti & Sonar if you ensure the first Virus clip starts at measure 1, with song start at measure 2.
2012/10/02 12:45:06
Heroics
I just hooked the snow first to a cubase ....and there I did not have to take in count the first measure and such .......dunno ......made me mad .....have agreat day all of you !  


BUt its good to know about that 1 and second measure thingey ....we are not all professors out there ^^ 

appreciate this forum ,it realy helps if realy needed ......

bamshizles 

  


Siege them with sound !

Mystic38


So, I hope you realise it is common, accepted and standard practice for the last 20 years for a project with midi information for the track to actually start at measure 2...

ALL midi gear (including the virus) takes time to sync to a host and frequently there is significant control & setup information being sent from a sequencer to the synth... patch changes, part volume & pan levels, RPN, NRPN and modulation information. having this information being dumped at the same time as note information can cause problems.


To close, there are no issues with latency or midi event timing with the Virus Ti & Sonar if you ensure the first Virus clip starts at measure 1, with song start at measure 2.




2012/10/02 16:14:45
EricDeluxe
Firstly, sorry to hear about your problems.

Secondly
Have you read the installation instructions for Virus TI for Sonar? You need to hit the "Live" in Virus Controller when using Sonar and Virus TI. It is recommended to do so by Access Music. Furthermore turn off Fast Bounce. More in the set-up manual for the Virus TI.

I've run Virus Snow on both X1 and X2. Work flawless. However, not if I don't hit the live button in Virus controller.

PS - I don't use the Virus as an Audio interface, I have another card (Motu).

Good luck!
2012/10/06 20:54:16
Heroics
Heroics


what is ur problem ?

10K users in this forum ,can not explain why this "outa synch" thing with access TI is in sonar ?

We use TI 
Judah


Kenneth


Don't feed it.
+1
LOL


I have learned that a one measure count in is absolut normal for the sequencer to get a grip of the datas .......also in cubase the nowtime line would start 1 measure in front of the access midi data ---yes !
 
 
 
2012/10/06 20:56:44
Heroics
Heroics


²²Hi 

I have just discovered that X1 does not compensate the latency generated while recording from the ACCESS TI . So its always starting like 4-20(!!!!!!!) ms late the audio in the recordings .....in cubase I did not have this problem . 
Since its TI , I have 2 use the realtime "bounce" ...........
but it actualy starts each recording too late ! Its not normal ----- why is this in sonar like this now ? 
I just had great fun with absolut tight realtime bounces with ACCESS TI in cubase ??? I can not explain this ????? 

in other words : the ACCESS looses "time" in sonar X1 expanded !

Its midi data is not synchronized 2 the recorded audio data ....some 100ms !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMG!
    


   

have a nice day



is there a trick ????


it realy ,realy pisses me off !   sry my french ......I just worked on a project with a friend ,,,,,,had to use cubase with my ALL new access TI ...I was surprised how tight it records ----
now I just had my shock in sonar X1 


OMG

PROBLEM SOLVED :......timimng is ultra tight ...   just make one bar space before the midi data that must be recorded ! Thats it
 
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account