Here we go :

Video 1 :

label refersh delay / lagg 

http://s638.photobucket.c...42-421_zps0d6d288c.mp4

post will be edited with videos of all issues ...


Video 2 :

track selection synchronisation issue (maybe it's supposed to be like that ?!):

http://s638.photobucket.c...19-491_zpsfd32cdb2.mp4

I cant say that is any slower than what I am experiencing here

And so  ? do you remeber how it was ?

Yeah it was the same speed as when you were banking up and down the 8 faders in your video.

Ryan did explain the reason behind it in his messages above though :)

lol my next videos show that selecting a track on soanr X1 doesn't sho the selection in the console alwayz ...so the whole argument is trying to implement some that deosn't work ( not really sure if it's the same )  

i don't even want a fix , i just want that old implementation  aka the old X1C protocol to be sinstalled , is it that crazy to have ?


Anyway for cakewalk , it is set as "normal" ....it's like super we have a new features , but your user expereience ginna change , beacuse of this feature , your vs 700 gonna be slower refreshing .....now if we say : we want it like it used to be  !!  have you heard someone requested the feature ? but i heard complains on the refresh stuff .....so if on my ferrari a guy want to add a bling bling gagdget that make me lose 100 horses , i will say keep your thing and bring back my horses ! evident ....

"" i don't eeven want a fix , i just want that old implementation aka the old X1C protocol to be sinstalled , is it that crazy to have ? ""



Did you not read the post from Ryan saying that the reason it is now the way it is is to stop specific bugs that were happening ?

Video 2 added to my post ..

http://s638.photobucket.c...19-491_zpsfd32cdb2.mp4

Anybody else can confirm this ? on his system ?

Feelings ?

Zo are you running latest Driver / Firmware ?

yep