• SONAR
  • ANYONE USING SAMPLE RATE 192KHZ HERE THAT WORKS WITH LP64 ? (p.3)
2012/09/25 02:49:33
phrygiann
Jeff you are right, MILLION THANKS TO YOU , I set the asio reported latency to the highest and try to go down to the last settings which lp64 eq and multiband works perfectly at 65.8 msec total roundtrip.
It was set to 33 msec which is my setting for mixing which i did not suspect it  needs higher setting in X2.
 PROBLEM SOLVED!!
THANKS TO ALL WHO MADE COMMENTS!!!!
2012/09/25 03:59:43
mattplaysguitar
Wow, 66 msec latency... You're going to be wanting to use your direct monitoring on your interface for recording with that latency!!
2012/09/25 08:11:42
Jonbouy
Phrygiann your question was indeed clear and if I had the overhauled version of LP64 that comes with X2 I certainly would have tested it for you.
 
I wasn't dismissing your decision to run at 192 kHz, as was more intrigued as to the reason you choose that sample rate when currently no industry standards require it.
 
I know some of the hard core synth guys will sometimes use it on synths not equipped with over-sampling and I've understood the reasoning behind that.  I've yet to hear of a good reason to use it during the standard course of music production.
 
I was hoping to learn something.
 
It's more important for me to run my Quad with a 5ms round trip latency figure than it is to consider the marginal differences between 44.1 or 48 kHz and higher rates but I totally respect your decision to run at whatever rate you want.
 
No offence meant.
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account