2016/03/21 01:33:50
bapu
.....according to Zeno.
 
That which is in locomotion must arrive at the half-way stage before it arrives at the goal.– as recounted by AristotlePhysics VI:9, 239b10
Suppose Bapu wants to catch a stationary bus. Before he can get there, he must get halfway there. Before he can get halfway there, he must get a quarter of the way there. Before traveling a quarter, he must travel one-eighth; before an eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on.
 
See?
 
2016/03/21 01:40:13
craigb
If you have trouble catching a stationary bus, then I wouldn't try catching one that's moving! 
(Just sayin'...)
2016/03/21 09:04:35
Moshkito
Hi,
 
Getting somewhere is always a good reason to forget why we never get anywhere?
 
Trying to be deep here with a reasonable lyric ... but it sounds awful and quite top ten rubbish!
2016/03/21 09:23:10
SteveStrummerUK
 
 
bapu
.....according to Zeno.
 
That which is in locomotion must arrive at the half-way stage before it arrives at the goal.– as recounted by AristotlePhysics VI:9, 239b10
Suppose Bapu wants to catch a stationary bus. Before he can get there, he must get halfway there. Before he can get halfway there, he must get a quarter of the way there. Before traveling a quarter, he must travel one-eighth; before an eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on.
 
See?
 




Why yes.... yes I do see.
 
There are two important things to consider with this seemingly unsolvable conundrum:
  1. For the theorem to be disproved, we have to assume that the Bapu is moving at a constant speed and, with all other things such as wind speed, friction and the conservation of angular momentum taken into consideration, as well as the physical and quantum limitations on the eventual halving of the Planck Constant, the fractional change can to some extent be ignored if the numerator is a positive integer
  2. Penis
2016/03/21 10:24:58
bapu
I like #2.
 
Wait that did not come out right.
2016/03/21 10:29:10
SteveStrummerUK
bapu
I like #2.
 
Wait that did not come out right.




PWF!! *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Penis-wettingly-funny
2016/03/21 10:35:21
Mesh
SteveStrummerUK
bapu
I like #2.
 
Wait that did not come out right.




PWF!! *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
* Penis-wettingly-funny


Depends will work for both instances.
HTH

2016/03/21 14:39:11
craigb
At least this isn't more squirrel porn...
(Or is it?)
2016/03/21 18:28:30
BobF
I prefer my squirrels with fur
2016/03/21 18:28:41
BobF
and bacon
 
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account