GMcT
The simple fact that this "fully featured professional DAW" has no end of project marker is a really basic oversight.
The fact that you have to select what you need to be rendered in advance, is an extra step that professionally speaking, should not be required.
You know, I think the export selection system could be better. Indeed, I've raised it myself here before, and Noel popped up to discuss it, and he and I and others had a fairly promising discussion about ways it might be improved in the future. So I'm no apologist for how it currently works.
But I can't see how one can equate "professional" with "doesn't want to think about selecting what's to be exported". If you've got to deliver release-standard content, be that in music, audiobooks, video games, film, or whatever, then you're just not going to be using whatever the automated option is anyway. You're going to be making sure that the file starts and ends exactly how and when you mean it to.
That's what "professional" is, not somehow owning the magical fantasy DAW that allows you to stop being thorough and careful about what you deliver. Things like this do not put off professionals; nobody professional would even want the software making these kinds of decisions for them. This is, frankly, a hobbyist's complaint.
Don't get me wrong: I'm all for things being better for hobbyists. I'm not sneering at anyone here. But honestly, this is like saying "this camera doesn't auto-focus and auto-zoom, it expects you to do those things, surely professional cameramen hate it."