• Software
  • MJUC variable-tube comp + update 1.0.2 | Klanghelm (p.4)
2015/07/18 10:47:21
LANEY
Very nice plug!
2015/07/18 11:12:05
clintmartin
Leadfoot
Tony came through! Less than 2 hours after I emailed him, I got a reply with my zip file attached. Class A service!

It's easy to support guys like Tony. Class A plugins and class A service! And the price is stupid cheap!
Interesting conversation on the lack of VST3. It seems it's becoming such a huge pain that plans are to drop VST3 in his other plugins as soon as he can upgrade them all over to the juice framework (which is what is used for MJUC). I know Tokyo Dawn originally planned on having VST3 and also decided against it.
2015/07/19 07:30:33
Leadfoot
I finally got around to installing it last night. I put it on the master buss of a song where I previously had my variable mu emulation from the liquid mix. Wow! I'm loving it, and it's so easy to get the sound you're looking for! But even still, I found myself tweaking for an hour or so. There are so many tonal nuances that you can get with this thing! Thank you, Tony!
2015/07/19 17:10:42
Jeff Evans
After many attempts mastering the first big killer track for this album I am mastering right now, I switched back to the second model instead of the third.  It really sounds good.  Yes it has more colour and mojo or whatever but it suits this track better.
 
The three models sound different so please make sure you listen to all of them.  I was on Model 3 for a long time with this track but now I am loving how Model 2 sounds instead.  (Like I did right at the start)
 
I have also found some of the quieter tracks sound nice with Model 3 instead.  I need to get my teeth into Model 1 too and find where it sits in the overall scheme of things.
 
It is a great compressor on a mix.  I am pushing it a little harder too now and getting it into -2 gain reduction heading into -3 territory as well.  (only on loud bits)  It is great you can switch models on the fly while the track is playing.  You do have to readjust a few things though when you do this.  You wont get the exact same amount of GR in all three models either.  So you need to tweak the input and output levels when you do change them on the fly.  But they are often quite close though.
 
I use to borrow the Smart C2 hardware compressor from the TAFE I was teaching at the time and use it on albums for mastering.  It was very nice.  In some ways the MJUC is the best software thing I have used that comes close to this in a funny sort of way.
 
Another very cool thing is that you can look at the GUI in different sizes. I find on a 27" monitor setting the GUI to 125% or so makes it very easy to adjust as well.
 
 
2015/07/19 20:06:43
LunaTech
Ok...
 
I was just playing around with mode 1 which is supposed to be the most colored  because of the straight tube signal path and the ability to use the controls to "add" tube stages.  I had been using mode 3 on a Massive patch of an "airy Rhodes" . The tone was full and warm with a touch of baby hair definitely there.   I switched to mode one.  When on mode 3, I had the timbre set to -2 and the drive set to 7 as I was testing the variation given by the settings. I got up to get something to drink, sat back down and played the patch.. I thought something had happened to my signal chain at first! (It did). 
 
This is a great unit because the modes really do give you three different compressors with distinct personalities for the same purchase price. Yes, the plugin is certifiable schizophrenic.  in short the sound had went from definitely there "baby hair" to full on "Yeti" (mid frequency content) with the same basic control settings. The drive control really does add "sizzle" to the signal.  I am not saying that the mode (1) (or a 7 setting for the drive) would be good for the Rhodes sound I was looking for,  but boy did it show the kind of variation that is available. And it is controllable. This kind of stuff generally does not get my tea percolating these days.. But today was an exception.. Again Tony and Company... Nicely done.
2015/07/19 22:35:07
cecelius2
What kind of CPU load/hit does MPUC have?  
 
Given the discussion in this thread, I am interested in this as an alternative to Mixbus3, which I like but is not 100% stable.  
 
Normally I would try a demo, but the demo prvided is only for the MJUC Jr version.  I realize that for master bus use, the CPU hit is not that much of an issue, but still it would be good to know in advance if it is heavy on the cpu.
2015/07/19 22:42:47
ltb
This has nothing to do with Mixbus 3, that's a console emulation daw.
For that you'd want to use something like Slate's VCC, Waves NLS, tape & saturation plugins.
 
Tony released the free MJUC jr. version with the highest cpu usage so one could see how it performs.
IIRC it's a combo of models 1&2. I'd download it & see for yourself.
2015/07/19 23:04:26
cecelius2
Thanks.  Yes, I know it has nothing to do with Mixbus3; I realize it is a compressor, but one that has "character".  I do have the MJUC Jr and have played with it; Jr has a very low CPU hit on my machine.  Just wondering about the full version since it has more bells and whistles.  Still. Thanks for clarifying that it is a compressor and not an emulator.
2015/07/19 23:09:23
ltb
Then the full version will work fine.
It's has saturation, distortion, Timbre, punch. You could even use without the comp on & shape the sound.
As I said, very versatile.
 
There's also the manual you can read or download.
http://klanghelm.com/MJUC_audiodemos.php
2015/07/19 23:30:39
Leadfoot
cecelius2
 I do have the MJUC Jr and have played with it; Jr has a very low CPU hit on my machine.  Just wondering about the full version since it has more bells and whistles.

I got the full version, and I only noticed a very slight hit when I had it on the master buss, and I'm running an old Q9550 Core 2 Quad machine.
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account