• Software
  • MJUC variable-tube comp + update 1.0.2 | Klanghelm (p.5)
2015/07/19 23:39:30
clintmartin
cecelius2
What kind of CPU load/hit does MPUC have?  
 
Given the discussion in this thread, I am interested in this as an alternative to Mixbus3, which I like but is not 100% stable.  
 
Normally I would try a demo, but the demo prvided is only for the MJUC Jr version.  I realize that for master bus use, the CPU hit is not that much of an issue, but still it would be good to know in advance if it is heavy on the cpu.


Your probably thinking of the Mixbus thread and the conversation Jeff and I were having. We have both been testing Mixbus 3 and MJUC at the same time. Basically we were saying while Mixbus does indeed have some issues...MJUC is giving a nice analog type mojo that is filling the gap for the time being. I was not trying to compare the two. MJUC is a spectacular compressor and I have high hopes for Mixbus 3 too. Sonar will always be my main daw. There is no comparison between Sonar and Mixbus 3.
2015/07/19 23:59:49
cecelius2
clintmartin
cecelius2
What kind of CPU load/hit does MPUC have?  
 
Given the discussion in this thread, I am interested in this as an alternative to Mixbus3, which I like but is not 100% stable.  
 
Normally I would try a demo, but the demo prvided is only for the MJUC Jr version.  I realize that for master bus use, the CPU hit is not that much of an issue, but still it would be good to know in advance if it is heavy on the cpu.


Your probably thinking of the Mixbus thread and the conversation Jeff and I were having. We have both been testing Mixbus 3 and MJUC at the same time. Basically we were saying while Mixbus does indeed have some issues...MJUC is giving a nice analog type mojo that is filling the gap for the time being. I was not trying to compare the two. MJUC is a spectacular compressor and I have high hopes for Mixbus 3 too. Sonar will always be my main daw. There is no comparison between Sonar and Mixbus 3.


Thanks.  Yes, that is where I read the comparison.  Based upon this thread and the youtube video, I went ahead and just purchased the full version  of MJUC.   I have Waves NLS, Slate's VCC, and of course Sonar's console emulation.  Adding MJUC just gives more options, and it really does look like it will be a useful tool.  I have not been in the market for a new compressor, but this one really caught my attention.  
 
Thanks guys for a helpful thread!
2015/07/20 03:31:39
Jeff Evans
One thing I discovered about MJUC and that is to set the cal level.  It is up the top right.  It sets the VU meter response level wise and the signal level through the compressor too.  Mine was on -18 but I have been working at -14 instead. Once I set that to -14 the input output levels changed and it seemed more correct for -14. (these are all rms readings)
 
I have been using no drive, opting for total clean sound.  I did go back to the Model 3 in the end because the client could hear the compression as subtle as it was from Model 2.  In model 3 there is just no hearing it.
 
The side chain filter needs to be thought about too.  If you raise it then it does not respond to the frequencies below where it is set meaning you will get more low end through uncompressed.  I preferred the sound however using a HP filter to remove unwanted sub bass stuff first before hitting the EQ even.  That meant the SC filter could be dropped right down or off so the low end was having an impact on the compressor too.  If the sound hitting the compressor is well balanced then it is a lot happier in general anyway.
 
I have finished mastering this whole album now and it has done an excellent job on it.  Sounds killer everywhere and in the car too!
 
Yes Mixbus is a different thing.  I was able to do what I needed mastering wise with MJUC instead.  Sometimes Mixbus does not always work perfectly for mastering either but that is another story.
 
I also have Klanghelm SDRR too and that is pretty nice at what it does as well.  I tend to use that on buses just processing part of a mix though, not for overall mastering.
 
2015/07/21 22:57:13
Jimbo21
I was just mixing a song with an acoustic lead kinda almost flamenco guitar part in it. I added, I think, the mk3 ( the one with punch as a parameter) and used one of the guitar presets to start and messed with it including adjusting the punch to 2. Right after choosing 2 the transients just thickened up in a nice way on the guitar lines. Then I thought, "okay I'm done here, moving on".Very nice! I've also tried it on the 2 bus on this song and removed The Glue, which is my go to bus comp. I think I'm going to be using this comp a lot.
 
*Edited to get the correct number for the punch parameter.
2015/07/22 07:19:41
Leadfoot
Yep... I think it's replaced my old standby too.
2015/07/24 08:52:16
ltb
dupe
2015/07/24 08:52:16
ltb
new update today to v 1.0.1


2015/07/24 10:25:21
clintmartin
Plugin of the year? It's got my vote!
2015/07/24 10:46:57
ltb
clintmartin
Plugin of the year? It's got my vote!


He really hit it out of the ballpark with this one.
I love plugins like this. Simple, effective & lets you concentrate on the making music rather than being concerned with numbers, percentages , values or theories.
2015/07/24 18:13:01
Jimbo21
carl
clintmartin
Plugin of the year? It's got my vote!


He really hit it out of the ballpark with this one.
I love plugins like this. Simple, effective & lets you concentrate on the making music rather than being concerned with numbers, percentages , values or theories.




 
Ditto!!!
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account