ORIGINAL: dstrenz
They don't lose all of their resale value so it's not like you're throwing all that money out the window. After spending $2000 on one, you might be able to sell it for about $1500 next year.
Having bought and sold a good deal of hardware over the years I would have to disagree with this estimate. Figure more practically around 50% of what you paid for it - not what it retails or MAPs for. In other words the Fantom-G 61 MAPs for around $2600, but let's say you talk them into $2400. Then that's what you paid for it. Expect to get $1200 when you sell it. Many people claim to do better, but that's been my experience. Used equipment buyers are by and large a very savvy bunch and will lead you right up to the drool of thinking you have the piece sold only to lowball you a couple of hundred (or more). Had it happen many times. Always took the deal! Of course if you turn around and sell right away, while the piece is still hot - like within the first year, maybe figure more like 33% less than what you paid for it. But why would you want to do that? In either case, selling a piece of hardware is a losing proposition. Make sure you buy the right thing at the right price from the get go.
Now, the other sentiment in this thread is how superior in both features and value is software to hardware. That's understandable. This is a software-based forum. Cakewalk makes software, not hardware workstations. Go over to the MPC forums
www.mpc-forums.com and you'll hear a completely different sentiment. Same with the Motif, Korg, and Fantom forums
www.motifator.com/forums www.korgforums.com www.fantomized.info Most people who use both agree - they each have their strengths and weaknesses, and given the appropriate budget, many productive people use a combination of both. That's why Akai, Roland, Yamaha, and Korg are still in business. There is still a significant market and demand for the reliability and ease-of-use that hardware offers.