I get the point CJ.
I am fully for the latest, no doubt. All I am saying is that Vista is not too old, definitely not old as XP, particularly Vista SP2 which runs most of the latest software very well. I know that if I have the latest laptop with the best processor and the highest RAM and the latest OS and the largest number of cores, I would have no problem. But thats pretty obvious.
Question is : When I know that X2 could work quite well to the extent of my needs on my current laptop with Vista SP2 and when I am ready to put $99 to upgrade to X2, is it justified that I have to purchase a new laptop which could cost me $800 or more just because the latest upgrade does not support my OS AND is not tested on my OS ?
They didnt test it on Vista, why on earth ? The focus on Win 7 and 8 is really good, but testing on Vista and confirming compatibility would give comfort to current Vista users and could have been done anyway. Why was it not tested on Vista, 7 & 8, all at the same time ?
As I understand, it may run on Vista nevertheless, but it is a risk for users if its not tested and confirmed and therefore a discouragement to Vista users to go for X2 rightaway. Though I wanted to be an early adopter.
Or am I the only Vista user around running Sonar X1 Producer Expanded ?