This sounds very interesting to me....any details available ??

Yes, very interested as well, would love to know how this compares to the Steven Slate offerings.

And to Waves NLS...

Will be interesting to see...

I'm interested to know if it was coded strictly in-house or if they enlisted the help of a 3rd party.

I thought I saw the "Neve" word somewhere...

I don't get it. The Pro Channel IS a console emulator. So they are going to put a console emulator inside a console emulator?

Well If I can make my recordings sound like they came off a Neve board, I'll take it...I need more details please, but this sounds like a definite advancement in "in the box"recordings.

I'm really curious about this !!

djwayne


Well If I can make my recordings sound like they came off a Neve board, I'll take it...I need more details please, but this sounds like a definite advancement in "in the box"recordings.

Advancement?

Neve EMU has been around for years now.

I enjoy your enthusiasm, and it's better to be positive than negative of which I'm guilty of a lot of the time, but saying Cakewalk offering a Console Emulator that nestles in the Pro Channel is an "advancement in  "in the box"recordings" is hysterical.

I'm greatly looking forward to X2 myself, but I'm not excited to the point where I start making things up ...

@ampfixer ... +1

Edited for grammar.

The Pro Channel IS a console emulator. So they are going to put a console emulator inside a console emulator?

 
I look at the PC as a "console strip" for whatever that's worth.  For example, the Quad Curve EQ is meant to emulate multiple classic console EQ, while the Comps are based on Urie and SSL (one of which is a console).   And then there's Saturation...  Great, now I've talked myself into being a little more confused than I was.   
 
I guess I still see a difference between the two, but I would also like to know more about how this new Console Emulation is meant to complement the existing modules.   Hmmm...   The Steven Slate and Waves plugs were mentioned - how would one use those along side EQs and Comps?
 

Bub

djwayne


Well If I can make my recordings sound like they came off a Neve board, I'll take it...I need more details please, but this sounds like a definite advancement in "in the box"recordings.

Advancement?

Neve EMU has been around for years now.

I enjoy your enthusiasm, and it's better to be positive than negative of which I'm guilty of a lot of the time, but saying Cakewalk offering a Console Emulator that nestles in the Pro Channel is an "advancement in  "in the box"recordings" is hysterical.

I'm greatly looking forward to X2 myself, but I'm not excited to the point where I start making things up ...

@ampfixer ... +1

Edited for grammar.

It's not hysterical at all..."in the box" recording technology has come a long way over the last ten years or so... this sounds like a new advancement to me. Compare today's digital recordings to ones that were made ten years ago, there's a world of difference. Ten years from now, who knows what ...10 years ago most people never heard of 64 bit....