Leee
But a key point you did not emphasize is that the "Craig Mastering" involved a fair amount of tweaking to get it the way you wanted to sound. Was there any tweaking done with the Ozone mastering?
My point is that with the same amount of tweaking you did on your own mastering take, you could have gotten the same or better results with Ozone 8. Most people know that the presets and AI results in Ozone, are just the starting point, you'll almost always need to tweak no matter what tools you are using.
The "Craig Mastered" take is clearly the best one of the three, not too soft, not too hot. Like Goldilocks and The Three Bears.
But each of the Ozone mastering takes, could have easily matched your take, with just a little bit of adjusting.
Very true. In fact I do not think it is a fair comparison because Algorithms in general can't sense emotion, state of mind; or importantly, perception.
What I mean is, when mixing or mastering something as a human, there are many factors which will play into the
"Why did i adjust this to here."Craig knows this, you get goose bumps, you have a rush of excitement. But on the Machine side of things, and as you rightfully added, it's all about algorithms. Does the AI know you have hit a sweet spot?
I am not saying anything wrong is done here but I would rather not compare the two.
It's like this:
Hire two Chefs to cook you a meal. Provide all the ingredients, however, one is a robot who has no sense of tasting and simply goes based on calculation of measurements, this robot also has no sense of what makes people love food, like spices.
Who do you think will make a better meal or at least have the slightest advantage?
I still think it's extremely exciting but hands down, Craig will always be better because he understands the Human Musical Perceptions, unless the AI had Craig's state of mind. :)