Guitarpima


The R-mix could also be helpful as an analyst by showing where things sit in the mix and help isolate things for a clearer mix.

To be honest, that was one of things I first thought as I watched the video. Then I realized how much discipline it took me to trust what I hear rather than what I see. So for me, in that application, it would be a bad thing. YM, of course, MV. However, it might just be the best thing since sliced bread. We'll just have to wait and see.

hmm... Oh well. Back to the drawing board. I have done a BIT of isolation type stuff using EQing in Nuendo to fix/replace things but it was very simplistic like dropped snares or basslines. I'll have to give that a try with X1 and see what I can come up with. Thanks for the insight, guys.

Michael Five


a tool for specialized filtering in raw tracks could be most useful...

So would audiosnap.

Oh and yes I do still think this looks like an awesome tool but probably not for what I'm looking to do. Seriously I don't even think it's possible to do what I'm envisioning properly. Maybe someday.

pdlstl

Guitarpima


The R-mix could also be helpful as an analyst by showing where things sit in the mix and help isolate things for a clearer mix.

To be honest, that was one of things I first thought as I watched the video. Then I realized how much discipline it took me to trust what I hear rather than what I see. So for me, in that application, it would be a bad thing. YM, of course, MV.

It could assist your ears by letting you hear what is conflicting. I agree though. Trust your ears more than your eyes. 

Yes it could. See my edited post.

It's the little blobs of color that threw me off. Couldn't we lasso those little blobs and isolate them to snag what we want and rebuild from there? Then tell the program to say "snag any blobs similar to this" with a sensitivity parameter to allow for variations. Or is this like crazy moon talk?

I stoked because I think it will make an awesome remix and sampling tool.

Now that I think of it why shouldn't this work? I had it backwards in my head though. I'd watch the blobs for the part I was trying to isolate and then do a general clean up to get all the unwanted stuff out of the way. Then a more pinpointed clean up. If the graphical representation of the audio is accurate there shouldn't be too many competing frequencies and even if there is it will match up in the final mix anyway. This might work... maybe... kind of... sort of.

Here is a really cool article by Craig Anderton that sheds some light on what it can do. http://www.harmonycentral.com/docs/DOC-2547