mudgel
Clearly then technology hasn’t advanced if the best we can do is a virtual emulation of hardware that existed more than 50 years ago. The only thing that’s really changed is the cost of entry has made it possible for anyone to play like Steely Dan.
Sorry forum for reviving this topic, particularly when the question has been answered...but I find Mudgel's (Micheal's) comment perturbing. This is because, the analogue emulation aesthetic isn't the only digital music innovation of the last 50 years. Digital musical instrument technology has advanced exponentially too...think early sampler tech like The Chamberlin, and The Mellotron...both of which lead to the sampling revolution of the 80s, and has become the de facto composition method in contemporary music...although I believe the sampling movement is now a curse somewhat without music literacy.
There are a whole raft of new controller tech emerging too, which can be used to create and control virtual musical instrument tech...think Notion by Presonus. If Beethoven were around today (maybe he is ;)) lol, but if he were around today...he'd basically say screw the orchestra, screw the band...I can now be a whole orchestra or a whole band...in his day he might have been able to hear the sounds of the orchestra in his head...but now he could not only hear (well if he wasn't deaf) the orchestral arrangements but play the orchestral arrangements. Then there is Sonar, and for many years now I've promoted the idea of Sonar being a digital instrument too...one that needs to be mastered. This includes the wonderful selection of plugs and synths or propitiatory effects it comes with. The two biggest problems within digital music today are...not treating ethereal instruments like real ones and indeed mastering these instruments, and the middle aged oldies like Mudgel (sorry Micheal), who seem to denigrate and misunderstand things like the analogue emulation aesthetic...I like to call these people neo-luddites who are nothing more than analogue fetish merchants. In fact, the analogue emulation aesthetic has very little to do with the digital...it is nothing more than replicating the successful analogue recording formula within a digital paradgim.
The digitized medium, unless you want its particular sonic aesthetic is not designed for music recording...it was designed IMO as the perfect storage and transmission medium. Think about it...tape those wonderful Beatle tapes for instance are degrading over time...digital solves this problem. And unlike 'real' analogue equipment when you transfer from the analogue tape medium, it adds nothing to the source material (with the best converters of course), meaning all that work done shaping the Beatles' recordings isn't messed up. With the analogue emulation aesthetic all we're doing is fixing the problem of digital as a recording medium. But this requires a rethink of digital recording techniques and philosophies...of which the middle aged oldies believe are wrong because it's the opposite of analogue - where you get the sound right before you commit to recording.
I haven't even mentioned Behringer working on an Augmented Reality instrument either lol...I for one am looking forward to this...so long as Dotard and Rocket man don't send us back to the stone age! No the future of digital music is bright, but only if we start to reintegrate music literacy back into contemporary music, we make knowing theory cool, and indeed...all virtual instrument playing knowledge is backed by real world playing knowledge. All musos should play an instrument IMO.
Ben