In a SONAR Songs forum I see absolutely zero reason to waste title space (or body space) on the fact that you used ANY version of SONAR. It's the final .wav, .mp3, .flac that counts.
 
Unless, of course, someone asks; I rarely say what tools are used. Though, on collabs I like to point out who played what.

bapu
In a SONAR Songs forum I see absolutely zero reason to waste title space (or body space) on the fact that you used ANY version of SONAR. It's the final .wav, .mp3, .flac that counts.
 
Unless, of course, someone asks; I rarely say what tools are used. Though, on collabs I like to point out who played what.

True dat. It's what it sounds like that matters.
 
There's at least one contributor who uses no Cakewalk software at all..they don't mention that either.

Song Bwoesdfsdsdlfjksd has been updated!  Now with a chorus!!!  I even added a third chord!!!  What do you think???
 
Hehe...  Sorry.  Couldn't resist. 

Thanks for comments!

bapu
In a SONAR Songs forum I see absolutely zero reason to waste title space (or body space) on the fact that you used ANY version of SONAR. It's the final .wav, .mp3, .flac that counts.
 
Unless, of course, someone asks; I rarely say what tools are used. Though, on collabs I like to point out who played what.

Nice. Wait a minute ... you mean you don't have to tell us that you don't use a Haynes t-shirt?
 
WOW ...

bapu
In a SONAR Songs forum I see absolutely zero reason to waste title space (or body space) on the fact that you used ANY version of SONAR. It's the final .wav, .mp3, .flac that counts.
 
Unless, of course, someone asks; I rarely say what tools are used. Though, on collabs I like to point out who played what.

Well I used 6 months Music Creator 5, but you are ofc right it's the final product that matters.